These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19604529)

  • 1. [Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability in the BI-RADS ultrasound system].
    Santana Montesdeoca JM; Gómez Arnáiz A; Fuentes Pavón R; Alemán Flores P; Limiñana Cañal JM; Jorrín Moreno A
    Radiologia; 2009; 51(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 19604529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value.
    Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS
    Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
    Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
    Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound.
    Lee HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Youk JH; Lee JY; Kang DR; Oh KK
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses.
    Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.
    Hong AS; Rosen EL; Soo MS; Baker JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Apr; 184(4):1260-5. PubMed ID: 15788607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description.
    Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography and the ultrasound BI-RADS lexicon of breast lesions.
    Park CS; Kim SH; Jung NY; Choi JJ; Kang BJ; Jung HS
    Breast Cancer; 2015 Mar; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 23584596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoring system based on BI-RADS lexicon to predict probability of malignancy in suspicious microcalcifications.
    Youk JH; Son EJ; Kim JA; Moon HJ; Kim MJ; Choi CH; Kim EK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1491-8. PubMed ID: 22173328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Inter-Observer Variability and Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of BI-RADS for Breast Ultrasound of Static versus Video Images.
    Youk JH; Jung I; Yoon JH; Kim SH; Kim YM; Lee EH; Jeong SH; Kim MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2083-8. PubMed ID: 27324292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
    Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of an automated breast volume scanner according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS for breast ultrasound compared with hand-held ultrasound.
    Choi EJ; Choi H; Park EH; Song JS; Youk JH
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():138-145. PubMed ID: 29362145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the applicability of BI-RADS® MRI for the interpretation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Travieso-Aja MM; Maldonado-Saluzzi D; Naranjo-Santana P; Fernández-Ruiz C; Severino-Rondón W; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Luzardo OP
    Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2019; 61(6):477-488. PubMed ID: 31262509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does power Doppler ultrasonography improve the BI-RADS category assessment and diagnostic accuracy of solid breast lesions?
    Tozaki M; Fukuma E
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):706-10. PubMed ID: 21596798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer aided classification system for breast ultrasound based on Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS).
    Shen WC; Chang RF; Moon WK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 33(11):1688-98. PubMed ID: 17681678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy and Efficiency of Categories 4 and 5 of the Second Edition of the BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon in Diagnosing Breast Lesions.
    Zou X; Wang J; Lan X; Lin Q; Han F; Liu L; Li A
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 42(9):2065-71. PubMed ID: 27262521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category.
    El Khoury M; Lalonde L; David J; Labelle M; Mesurolle B; Trop I
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 25454100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BI-RADS Category 5 Assessments at Diagnostic Breast Imaging:Outcomes Analysis Based on Lesion Descriptors.
    Yao MM; Joe BN; Sickles EA; Lee CS
    Acad Radiol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):1048-1052. PubMed ID: 30195413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial Intelligence in BI-RADS Categorization of Breast Lesions on Ultrasound: Can We Omit Excessive Follow-ups and Biopsies?
    Guldogan N; Taskin F; Icten GE; Yilmaz E; Turk EB; Erdemli S; Parlakkilic UT; Turkoglu O; Aribal E
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Jun; 31(6):2194-2202. PubMed ID: 38087719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis: interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization.
    Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Park JH; Lee KE; Kim JH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Sep; 197(3):747-54. PubMed ID: 21862820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.