BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19606296)

  • 1. Simultaneous generation of chemical concentration and mechanical shear stress gradients using microfluidic osmotic flow comparable to interstitial flow.
    Park JY; Yoo SJ; Hwang CM; Lee SH
    Lab Chip; 2009 Aug; 9(15):2194-202. PubMed ID: 19606296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cell culture chip using low-shear mass transport.
    Liu K; Pitchimani R; Dang D; Bayer K; Harrington T; Pappas D
    Langmuir; 2008 Jun; 24(11):5955-60. PubMed ID: 18471001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrated microfluidic chip for endothelial cells culture and analysis exposed to a pulsatile and oscillatory shear stress.
    Shao J; Wu L; Wu J; Zheng Y; Zhao H; Jin Q; Zhao J
    Lab Chip; 2009 Nov; 9(21):3118-25. PubMed ID: 19823728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cell morphological response to low shear stress in a two-dimensional culture microsystem with magnitudes comparable to interstitial shear stress.
    Park JY; Yoo SJ; Patel L; Lee SH; Lee SH
    Biorheology; 2010; 47(3-4):165-78. PubMed ID: 21084742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A practical guide to microfluidic perfusion culture of adherent mammalian cells.
    Kim L; Toh YC; Voldman J; Yu H
    Lab Chip; 2007 Jun; 7(6):681-94. PubMed ID: 17538709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gradient generation by an osmotic pump and the behavior of human mesenchymal stem cells under the fetal bovine serum concentration gradient.
    Park JY; Hwang CM; Lee SH; Lee SH
    Lab Chip; 2007 Dec; 7(12):1673-80. PubMed ID: 18030386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tapered microfluidic chip for the study of biochemical and mechanical response at subcellular level of endothelial cells to shear flow.
    Rossi M; Lindken R; Hierck BP; Westerweel J
    Lab Chip; 2009 May; 9(10):1403-11. PubMed ID: 19417907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microfluidic shear devices for quantitative analysis of cell adhesion.
    Lu H; Koo LY; Wang WM; Lauffenburger DA; Griffith LG; Jensen KF
    Anal Chem; 2004 Sep; 76(18):5257-64. PubMed ID: 15362881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tubular bioreactor models that include Onsager-Curie scalar cross-phenomena to describe stress-dependent rates of cell proliferation.
    Belfiore LA; Karim MN; Belfiore CJ
    Biophys Chem; 2008 Jun; 135(1-3):41-50. PubMed ID: 18423963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stress-sensitive nutrient consumption via steady and non-reversing dynamic shear in continuous-flow rotational bioreactors.
    Belfiore LA; Bonani W; Leoni M; Belfiore CJ
    Biophys Chem; 2009 May; 141(2-3):140-52. PubMed ID: 19261374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nanoliter scale microbioreactor array for quantitative cell biology.
    Lee PJ; Hung PJ; Rao VM; Lee LP
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 May; 94(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 16315325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of single-cell adhesion strength using a microfluidic assay.
    Christ KV; Williamson KB; Masters KS; Turner KT
    Biomed Microdevices; 2010 Jun; 12(3):443-55. PubMed ID: 20213215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel in vitro model of lymphatic metastasis from colorectal cancer.
    Yoo PS; Mulkeen AL; Dardik A; Cha CH
    J Surg Res; 2007 Nov; 143(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 17640671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An agarose-based microfluidic platform with a gradient buffer for 3D chemotaxis studies.
    Haessler U; Kalinin Y; Swartz MA; Wu M
    Biomed Microdevices; 2009 Aug; 11(4):827-35. PubMed ID: 19343497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel multishear microdevice for studying cell mechanics.
    Chau L; Doran M; Cooper-White J
    Lab Chip; 2009 Jul; 9(13):1897-902. PubMed ID: 19532965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External force-assisted cell positioning inside microfluidic devices.
    Rhee SW; Taylor AM; Cribbs DH; Cotman CW; Jeon NL
    Biomed Microdevices; 2007 Feb; 9(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 17091393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Collaborative effects of electric field and fluid shear stress on fibroblast migration.
    Song S; Han H; Ko UH; Kim J; Shin JH
    Lab Chip; 2013 Apr; 13(8):1602-11. PubMed ID: 23450300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dynamic osmotic loading of chondrocytes using a novel microfluidic device.
    Chao PG; Tang Z; Angelini E; West AC; Costa KD; Hung CT
    J Biomech; 2005 Jun; 38(6):1273-81. PubMed ID: 15863112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peptide-mediated selective adhesion of smooth muscle and endothelial cells in microfluidic shear flow.
    Plouffe BD; Njoka DN; Harris J; Liao J; Horick NK; Radisic M; Murthy SK
    Langmuir; 2007 Apr; 23(9):5050-5. PubMed ID: 17373836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mass transport and shear stress in a microchannel bioreactor: numerical simulation and dynamic similarity.
    Zeng Y; Lee TS; Yu P; Roy P; Low HT
    J Biomech Eng; 2006 Apr; 128(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 16524329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.