These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1960832)
1. How the doctor got gagged. The disintegrating right of privacy in the physician-patient relationship. Sugarman J; Powers M JAMA; 1991 Dec; 266(23):3323-7. PubMed ID: 1960832 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How the doctor got gagged. Archer WR JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):50; author reply 51. PubMed ID: 1608105 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason. Call EC J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK JAMA; 1990 Feb; 263(6):858-61. PubMed ID: 2296149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mum's the word: the Supreme Court and family planning. Mariner WK Am J Public Health; 1992 Feb; 82(2):296-301. PubMed ID: 1739169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The discourse ethics alternative to Rust v. Sullivan. Leedes GC Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1991; 26(1):87-143. PubMed ID: 11659547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Health law. Gostin LO JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(3):364-6. PubMed ID: 1535384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan. Maher L Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Lost in a doctrinal wasteland: the exceptionalism of doctor-patient speech within the Rehnquist Court's First Amendment jurisprudence. Berg PE Health Matrix Clevel; 1998; 8(2):153-77. PubMed ID: 10182216 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rust v Sullivan: legal issues and ethical concerns. Spielman B Womens Health Issues; 1991; 1(4):172-6. PubMed ID: 1822812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion law today. Field MA J Leg Med; 1993 Mar; 14(1):3-24. PubMed ID: 8463750 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. South Dakota's abortion script--threatening the physician-patient relationship. Lazzarini Z N Engl J Med; 2008 Nov; 359(21):2189-91. PubMed ID: 19020321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New York v. Sullivan. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Karlin v. Foust United States District Court western District of Wisconsin June 19, 1997. Bostrom B Issues Law Med; 1999; 14(4):377-88. PubMed ID: 10231999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The right of privacy protects the doctor-patient relationship. JAMA; 1990 Jul; 264(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2393438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent and the First Amendment. Mariner WK; Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2015 Apr; 372(14):1285-7. PubMed ID: 25830420 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]