283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19608436)
1. Chemical shift MRI: is there any contribution to morphologic evaluation of solid breast masses?
Gokalp G; Topal U; Bolca N; Ercan I
Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1263-71. PubMed ID: 19608436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI in the differential diagnosis of adrenal adenomas and malignant adrenal masses.
Inan N; Arslan A; Akansel G; Anik Y; Balci NC; Demirci A
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):154-62. PubMed ID: 17466481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Angle between 1 and 4 min gives the most significant difference in time-intensity curves between benign disease and breast cancer: analysis of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in 103 patients with breast lesions.
Hara M; Watanabe T; Okumura A; Kato K; Mohri N; Ishikawa M; Mizuno A; Takeyama H
Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):335-42. PubMed ID: 19712811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A combined high temporal and high spatial resolution 3 Tesla MR imaging protocol for the assessment of breast lesions: initial results.
Pinker K; Grabner G; Bogner W; Gruber S; Szomolanyi P; Trattnig S; Heinz-Peer G; Weber M; Fitzal F; Pluschnig U; Rudas M; Helbich T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):553-8. PubMed ID: 19652611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of suspicious nipple discharge by magnetic resonance mammography based on breast imaging reporting and data system magnetic resonance imaging descriptors.
Tokuda Y; Kuriyama K; Nakamoto A; Choi S; Yutani K; Kunitomi Y; Haneda T; Kawai M; Masuda N; Takeda M; Nakamura H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 19188786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation.
Gokalp G; Topal U; Yildirim N; Tolunay S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast MRI: Are T2 IR sequences useful in the evaluation of breast lesions?
Ballesio L; Savelli S; Angeletti M; Porfiri LM; D'Ambrosio I; Maggi C; Castro ED; Bennati P; Fanelli GP; Vestri AR; Manganaro L
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 18479866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fat suppression with spectrally selective inversion vs. high spectral and spatial resolution MRI of breast lesions: qualitative and quantitative comparisons.
Fan X; Abe H; Medved M; Foxley S; Arkani S; Zamora MA; Olopade OI; Newstead GM; Karczmar GS
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Dec; 24(6):1311-5. PubMed ID: 17096393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between lesion size and signal enhancement on subtraction fat-suppressed MR imaging of the breast.
Cheung HS; Tse GM; Lai SY; Yeung DK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Nov; 22(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 15607097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of dynamic phase subtraction (DPS) map in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast.
Ogura A; Hayakawa K; Yoshida S; Maeda F; Saeki F; Syukutani A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 22082548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole-body MRI of multiple myeloma: comparison of different MRI sequences in assessment of different growth patterns.
Weininger M; Lauterbach B; Knop S; Pabst T; Kenn W; Hahn D; Beissert M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):339-45. PubMed ID: 18096344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of three different software systems in the evaluation of dynamic MRI of the breast.
Kurz KD; Steinhaus D; Klar V; Cohnen M; Wittsack HJ; Saleh A; Mödder U; Blondin D
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):300-7. PubMed ID: 18060715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of breast lesions with CE-MR multimodal morphological and kinetic analysis: comparison with conventional mammography and high-resolution ultrasound.
Vassiou K; Kanavou T; Vlychou M; Poultsidi A; Athanasiou E; Arvanitis DL; Fezoulidis IV
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 18295425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences.
Wenkel E; Geppert C; Schulz-Wendtland R; Uder M; Kiefer B; Bautz W; Janka R
Acad Radiol; 2007 Sep; 14(9):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17707315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features.
Goto M; Ito H; Akazawa K; Kubota T; Kizu O; Yamada K; Nishimura T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jan; 25(1):104-12. PubMed ID: 17152054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions.
Tsili AC; Argyropoulou MI; Astrakas LG; Ntoulia EA; Giannakis D; Sofikitis N; Tsampoulas K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Mar; 200(3):578-85. PubMed ID: 23436847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of gadoteric acid and gadobutrol for detection as well as morphologic and dynamic characterization of lesions on breast dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Renz DM; Durmus T; Böttcher J; Taupitz M; Diekmann F; Huppertz A; Pfeil A; Maurer MH; Streitparth F; Bick U; Hamm B; Fallenberg EM
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jul; 49(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 24637587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of breast cancer types by texture analysis of magnetic resonance images.
Holli K; Lääperi AL; Harrison L; Luukkaala T; Toivonen T; Ryymin P; Dastidar P; Soimakallio S; Eskola H
Acad Radiol; 2010 Feb; 17(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 19945302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
