369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19608599)
1. Protein identification false discovery rates for very large proteomics data sets generated by tandem mass spectrometry.
Reiter L; Claassen M; Schrimpf SP; Jovanovic M; Schmidt A; Buhmann JM; Hengartner MO; Aebersold R
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2009 Nov; 8(11):2405-17. PubMed ID: 19608599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. iProphet: multi-level integrative analysis of shotgun proteomic data improves peptide and protein identification rates and error estimates.
Shteynberg D; Deutsch EW; Lam H; Eng JK; Sun Z; Tasman N; Mendoza L; Moritz RL; Aebersold R; Nesvizhskii AI
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Dec; 10(12):M111.007690. PubMed ID: 21876204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-throughput database search and large-scale negative polarity liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with ultraviolet photodissociation for complex proteomic samples.
Madsen JA; Xu H; Robinson MR; Horton AP; Shaw JB; Giles DK; Kaoud TS; Dalby KN; Trent MS; Brodbelt JS
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 12(9):2604-14. PubMed ID: 23695934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved False Discovery Rate Estimation Procedure for Shotgun Proteomics.
Keich U; Kertesz-Farkas A; Noble WS
J Proteome Res; 2015 Aug; 14(8):3148-61. PubMed ID: 26152888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Deep coverage of the Escherichia coli proteome enables the assessment of false discovery rates in simple proteogenomic experiments.
Krug K; Carpy A; Behrends G; Matic K; Soares NC; Macek B
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Nov; 12(11):3420-30. PubMed ID: 23908556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. MSFragger: ultrafast and comprehensive peptide identification in mass spectrometry-based proteomics.
Kong AT; Leprevost FV; Avtonomov DM; Mellacheruvu D; Nesvizhskii AI
Nat Methods; 2017 May; 14(5):513-520. PubMed ID: 28394336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Oscore: a combined score to reduce false negative rates for peptide identification in tandem mass spectrometry analysis.
Shao C; Sun W; Li F; Yang R; Zhang L; Gao Y
J Mass Spectrom; 2009 Jan; 44(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 18698557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Scalable Approach for Protein False Discovery Rate Estimation in Large Proteomic Data Sets.
Savitski MM; Wilhelm M; Hahne H; Kuster B; Bantscheff M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Sep; 14(9):2394-404. PubMed ID: 25987413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving sensitivity in proteome studies by analysis of false discovery rates for multiple search engines.
Jones AR; Siepen JA; Hubbard SJ; Paton NW
Proteomics; 2009 Mar; 9(5):1220-9. PubMed ID: 19253293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Score regularization for peptide identification.
He Z; Zhao H; Yu W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Feb; 12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S2. PubMed ID: 21342549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tandem Mass Spectrum Sequencing: An Alternative to Database Search Engines in Shotgun Proteomics.
Muth T; Rapp E; Berven FS; Barsnes H; Vaudel M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():217-226. PubMed ID: 27975219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maximizing the sensitivity and reliability of peptide identification in large-scale proteomic experiments by harnessing multiple search engines.
Yu W; Taylor JA; Davis MT; Bonilla LE; Lee KA; Auger PL; Farnsworth CC; Welcher AA; Patterson SD
Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1172-89. PubMed ID: 20101609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-depth analysis of protein inference algorithms using multiple search engines and well-defined metrics.
Audain E; Uszkoreit J; Sachsenberg T; Pfeuffer J; Liang X; Hermjakob H; Sanchez A; Eisenacher M; Reinert K; Tabb DL; Kohlbacher O; Perez-Riverol Y
J Proteomics; 2017 Jan; 150():170-182. PubMed ID: 27498275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Calculation of False Discovery Rate for Peptide and Protein Identification.
Prieto G; Vázquez J
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2051():145-159. PubMed ID: 31552628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A high-confidence human plasma proteome reference set with estimated concentrations in PeptideAtlas.
Farrah T; Deutsch EW; Omenn GS; Campbell DS; Sun Z; Bletz JA; Mallick P; Katz JE; Malmström J; Ossola R; Watts JD; Lin B; Zhang H; Moritz RL; Aebersold R
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2011 Sep; 10(9):M110.006353. PubMed ID: 21632744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality control of single amino acid variations detected by tandem mass spectrometry.
Yi X; Wang B; An Z; Gong F; Li J; Fu Y
J Proteomics; 2018 Sep; 187():144-151. PubMed ID: 30012419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A statistical framework to discover true associations from multiprotein complex pull-down proteomics data sets.
Shen C; Li L; Chen JY
Proteins; 2006 Aug; 64(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16705649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MSblender: A probabilistic approach for integrating peptide identifications from multiple database search engines.
Kwon T; Choi H; Vogel C; Nesvizhskii AI; Marcotte EM
J Proteome Res; 2011 Jul; 10(7):2949-58. PubMed ID: 21488652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Data analysis and bioinformatics tools for tandem mass spectrometry in proteomics.
Deutsch EW; Lam H; Aebersold R
Physiol Genomics; 2008 Mar; 33(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18212004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-sensitive online learning method for peptide identification.
Liang X; Xia Z; Jian L; Wang Y; Niu X; Link AJ
BMC Genomics; 2020 Apr; 21(1):324. PubMed ID: 32334531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
