369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19608599)
41. False discovery rates of protein identifications: a strike against the two-peptide rule.
Gupta N; Pevzner PA
J Proteome Res; 2009 Sep; 8(9):4173-81. PubMed ID: 19627159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Potential for false positive identifications from large databases through tandem mass spectrometry.
Cargile BJ; Bundy JL; Stephenson JL
J Proteome Res; 2004; 3(5):1082-5. PubMed ID: 15473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prediction of error associated with false-positive rate determination for peptide identification in large-scale proteomics experiments using a combined reverse and forward peptide sequence database strategy.
Huttlin EL; Hegeman AD; Harms AC; Sussman MR
J Proteome Res; 2007 Jan; 6(1):392-8. PubMed ID: 17203984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Effective Leveraging of Targeted Search Spaces for Improving Peptide Identification in Tandem Mass Spectrometry Based Proteomics.
Shanmugam AK; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteome Res; 2015 Dec; 14(12):5169-78. PubMed ID: 26569054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Statistical validation of peptide identifications in large-scale proteomics using the target-decoy database search strategy and flexible mixture modeling.
Choi H; Ghosh D; Nesvizhskii AI
J Proteome Res; 2008 Jan; 7(1):286-92. PubMed ID: 18078310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Increased confidence in large-scale phosphoproteomics data by complementary mass spectrometric techniques and matching of phosphopeptide data sets.
Alcolea MP; Kleiner O; Cutillas PR
J Proteome Res; 2009 Aug; 8(8):3808-15. PubMed ID: 19537829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Proteomics-grade de novo sequencing approach.
Savitski MM; Nielsen ML; Kjeldsen F; Zubarev RA
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(6):2348-54. PubMed ID: 16335984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Computer aided manual validation of mass spectrometry-based proteomic data.
Curran TG; Bryson BD; Reigelhaupt M; Johnson H; White FM
Methods; 2013 Jun; 61(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 23500044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Protein Inference.
He Z; Huang T; Zhao C; Teng B
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 919():237-242. PubMed ID: 27975221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Submodular Generalized Matching for Peptide Identification in Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
Bai W; Bilmes J; Noble WS
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2019; 16(4):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 29993658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. PeptidePicker: a scientific workflow with web interface for selecting appropriate peptides for targeted proteomics experiments.
Mohammed Y; Domański D; Jackson AM; Smith DS; Deelder AM; Palmblad M; Borchers CH
J Proteomics; 2014 Jun; 106():151-61. PubMed ID: 24769191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Improving the Protein Inference from Bottom-Up Proteomic Data Using Identifications from MS1 Spectra.
Ivanov MV; Solovyeva EM; Bubis JA; Gorshkov MV
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom; 2021 May; 32(5):1258-1262. PubMed ID: 33900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. PRIDE Inspector Toolsuite: Moving Toward a Universal Visualization Tool for Proteomics Data Standard Formats and Quality Assessment of ProteomeXchange Datasets.
Perez-Riverol Y; Xu QW; Wang R; Uszkoreit J; Griss J; Sanchez A; Reisinger F; Csordas A; Ternent T; Del-Toro N; Dianes JA; Eisenacher M; Hermjakob H; Vizcaíno JA
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Jan; 15(1):305-17. PubMed ID: 26545397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prosit: proteome-wide prediction of peptide tandem mass spectra by deep learning.
Gessulat S; Schmidt T; Zolg DP; Samaras P; Schnatbaum K; Zerweck J; Knaute T; Rechenberger J; Delanghe B; Huhmer A; Reimer U; Ehrlich HC; Aiche S; Kuster B; Wilhelm M
Nat Methods; 2019 Jun; 16(6):509-518. PubMed ID: 31133760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Generic comparison of protein inference engines.
Claassen M; Reiter L; Hengartner MO; Buhmann JM; Aebersold R
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2012 Apr; 11(4):O110.007088. PubMed ID: 22057310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Trans-Proteomic Pipeline supports and improves analysis of electron transfer dissociation data sets.
Deutsch EW; Shteynberg D; Lam H; Sun Z; Eng JK; Carapito C; von Haller PD; Tasman N; Mendoza L; Farrah T; Aebersold R
Proteomics; 2010 Mar; 10(6):1190-5. PubMed ID: 20082347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. A dynamic noise level algorithm for spectral screening of peptide MS/MS spectra.
Xu H; Freitas MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Aug; 11():436. PubMed ID: 20731867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Large Scale Mass Spectrometry-based Identifications of Enzyme-mediated Protein Methylation Are Subject to High False Discovery Rates.
Hart-Smith G; Yagoub D; Tay AP; Pickford R; Wilkins MR
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Mar; 15(3):989-1006. PubMed ID: 26699799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. STEM: a software tool for large-scale proteomic data analyses.
Shinkawa T; Taoka M; Yamauchi Y; Ichimura T; Kaji H; Takahashi N; Isobe T
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1826-31. PubMed ID: 16212438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Systematic Errors in Peptide and Protein Identification and Quantification by Modified Peptides.
Bogdanow B; Zauber H; Selbach M
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 15(8):2791-801. PubMed ID: 27215553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
