These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19608800)
41. [Application of transpulmonary thermodilution for cardiac pathologies in anesthesiology practice]. Nuralidze KIu Georgian Med News; 2005 Mar; (120):12-5. PubMed ID: 15855689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection. El Sharkawy OA; Refaat EK; Ibraheem AE; Mahdy WR; Fayed NA; Mourad WS; Abd Elhafez HS; Yassen KA Saudi J Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 7(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 24348287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Perioperative use of the imacor hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography probe in cardiac surgery patients: initial experience. Sarosiek K; Kang CY; Johnson CM; Pitcher H; Hirose H; Cavarocchi NC ASAIO J; 2014; 60(5):553-8. PubMed ID: 25010912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: 1. FloTrac sensor and SVV]. Seo K Masui; 2009 Jul; 58(7):838-47. PubMed ID: 19618824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Effects of advanced haemodynamic monitoring on perioperative outcome in high-risk patients]. Weyland A; Scheeren T Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2012 Feb; 47(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 22402848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Hemodynamic monitoring: To calibrate or not to calibrate? Part 1--Calibrated techniques. Peeters Y; Bernards J; Mekeirele M; Hoffmann B; De Raes M; Malbrain ML Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2015; 47(5):487-500. PubMed ID: 26578399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. THE BENEFICIAL VALUES OF TRANSOESOPHAGEAL DOPPLER IN INTRAOPERATIVE FLUID GUIDANCE VERSUS STANDARD CLINICAL MONITORING PARAMETERS IN INFANTS UNDERGOING KASAI OPERATION. Ibrahim ES; Yassein TA; Morad WS Middle East J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 23(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 26442398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hemodynamic measurement in the operating room: a review of conventional measures to identify hypovolemia. D'Angelo MR; Dutton RP AANA J; 2009 Aug; 77(4):279-84. PubMed ID: 19731846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Development and application of a logistic-based systolic model for hemodynamic measurements using the esophageal Doppler monitor. Atlas GM Cardiovasc Eng; 2008 Sep; 8(3):159-73. PubMed ID: 18587646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Evaluation of a trans-oesophageal Doppler probe in awake subjects. English JD; Moppett IK Anaesthesia; 2005 Jul; 60(7):720-1. PubMed ID: 15960731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Urine flow is a novel hemodynamic monitoring tool for the detection of hypovolemia. Shamir MY; Kaplan L; Marans RS; Willner D; Klein Y Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):593-6. PubMed ID: 21304150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A comparison of stroke volume variation measured by Vigileo/FloTrac system and aortic Doppler echocardiography. Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Roullet S; Quinart A; Revel P; Sztark F Anesth Analg; 2009 Aug; 109(2):466-9. PubMed ID: 19608819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Additional hemodynamic measurements with an esophageal Doppler monitor: a preliminary report of compliance, force, kinetic energy, and afterload in the clinical setting. Atlas G; Brealey D; Dhar S; Dikta G; Singer M J Clin Monit Comput; 2012 Dec; 26(6):473-82. PubMed ID: 22892852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]