173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19610131)
1. On the use of propensity scores in principal causal effect estimation.
Jo B; Stuart EA
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(23):2857-75. PubMed ID: 19610131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the sensitivity of methods for estimating principal causal effects.
Stuart EA; Jo B
Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):657-74. PubMed ID: 21971481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of principal scores to estimate the marginal compliers causal effect of an intervention.
Porcher R; Leyrat C; Baron G; Giraudeau B; Boutron I
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(5):752-67. PubMed ID: 26381261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A refreshing account of principal stratification.
Mealli F; Mattei A
Int J Biostat; 2012; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22611592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Causal inference in longitudinal comparative effectiveness studies with repeated measures of a continuous intermediate variable.
Wang CP; Jo B; Brown CH
Stat Med; 2014 Sep; 33(20):3509-27. PubMed ID: 24577715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sensitivity analyses for the principal ignorability assumption using multiple imputation.
Wang C; Zhang Y; Mealli F; Bornkamp B
Pharm Stat; 2023 Jan; 22(1):64-78. PubMed ID: 36053974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity analysis for principal ignorability violation in estimating complier and noncomplier average causal effects.
Nguyen TQ; Stuart EA; Scharfstein DO; Ogburn EL
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38890728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted minimum loss based estimation of a causal effect on an outcome with known conditional bounds.
Gruber S; van der Laan MJ
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jul; 8(1):21. PubMed ID: 22850077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Principal stratification with predictors of compliance for randomized trials with 2 active treatments.
Roy J; Hogan JW; Marcus BH
Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 17681993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clarifying selection bias in cluster randomized trials.
Li F; Tian Z; Bobb J; Papadogeorgou G; Li F
Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 34894795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model misspecification sensitivity analysis in estimating causal effects of interventions with non-compliance.
Jo B
Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3161-81. PubMed ID: 12375297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Right Tool for the Job: Choosing Between Covariate-balancing and Generalized Boosted Model Propensity Scores.
Setodji CM; McCaffrey DF; Burgette LF; Almirall D; Griffin BA
Epidemiology; 2017 Nov; 28(6):802-811. PubMed ID: 28817469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data.
Xie Y; Brand JE; Jann B
Sociol Methodol; 2012 Aug; 42(1):314-347. PubMed ID: 23482633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Designs combining instrumental variables with case-control: estimating principal strata causal effects.
Shinohara RT; Frangakis CE; Platz E; Tsilidis K
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 22499727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec; 26(6):2505-2525. PubMed ID: 26329750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.
Linden A; Yarnold PR
J Eval Clin Pract; 2018 Apr; 24(2):380-387. PubMed ID: 29230910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Models for the propensity score that contemplate the positivity assumption and their application to missing data and causality.
Molina J; Sued M; Valdora M
Stat Med; 2018 Oct; 37(24):3503-3518. PubMed ID: 29873100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomization, matching, and propensity scores in the design and analysis of experimental studies with measured baseline covariates.
Loux TM
Stat Med; 2015 Feb; 34(4):558-70. PubMed ID: 25384851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
