These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19610286)
1. Evaluation of a variable dose acquisition technique for microcalcification and mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis. Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ Med Phys; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1976-84. PubMed ID: 19610286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: a 3D approach. Sahiner B; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Wei J; Zhou C; Lu Y Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):28-39. PubMed ID: 22225272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multichannel response analysis on 2D projection views for detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. Wei J; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA; Lu Y; Zhou C; Samala R Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):041913. PubMed ID: 24694144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis. Shaheen E; Van Ongeval C; Zanca F; Cockmartin L; Marshall N; Jacobs J; Young KC; R Dance D; Bosmans H Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6659-71. PubMed ID: 22149848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimized signal of calcifications in wide-angle digital breast tomosynthesis: a virtual imaging trial. Vancoillie L; Cockmartin L; Lueck F; Marshall N; Keupers M; Nanke R; Kappler S; Van Ongeval C; Bosmans H Eur Radiol; 2024 Oct; 34(10):6309-6319. PubMed ID: 38546790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital breast tomosynthesis: observer performance of clustered microcalcification detection on breast phantom images acquired with an experimental system using variable scan angles, angular increments, and number of projection views. Chan HP; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA; Zelakiewicz S; Schmitz A; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Nees AV; Neal CH; Carson P; Lu Y; Hadjiiski L; Wei J Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25007048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mass detection in reconstructed digital breast tomosynthesis volumes with a computer-aided detection system trained on 2D mammograms. van Schie G; Wallis MG; Leifland K; Danielsson M; Karssemeijer N Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041902. PubMed ID: 23556896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices. Chan HP; Wu YT; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhang Y; Moore RH; Kopans DB; Hadjiiski L; Way T Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3576-86. PubMed ID: 20831065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of clusters of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. Ho CP; Tromans C; Schnabel JA; Brady M Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2010; 2010():3166-9. PubMed ID: 21096808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated detection of microcalcification clusters for digital breast tomosynthesis using projection data only: a preliminary study. Reiser I; Nishikawa RM; Edwards AV; Kopans DB; Schmidt RA; Papaioannou J; Moore RH Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1486-93. PubMed ID: 18491543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images. Skaane P; Bandos AI; Eben EB; Jebsen IN; Krager M; Haakenaasen U; Ekseth U; Izadi M; Hofvind S; Gullien R Radiology; 2014 Jun; 271(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 24484063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. Gong X; Glick SJ; Liu B; Vedula AA; Thacker S Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):1041-52. PubMed ID: 16696481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel approach to digital breast tomosynthesis for simultaneous acquisition of 2D and 3D images. Vecchio S; Albanese A; Vignoli P; Taibi A Eur Radiol; 2011 Jun; 21(6):1207-13. PubMed ID: 21193910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of radiation dose estimates in digital breast tomosynthesis relative to those in two-view full-field digital mammography. Svahn TM; Houssami N; Sechopoulos I; Mattsson S Breast; 2015 Apr; 24(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 25554018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implementation and evaluation of an expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm for gamma emission breast tomosynthesis. Gong Z; Klanian K; Patel T; Sullivan O; Williams MB Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7580-92. PubMed ID: 23231306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of angular dose distribution on the detection of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis. Hu YH; Zhao W Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2455-66. PubMed ID: 21776781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis using complementary information of simulated projection. Kim ST; Kim DH; Ro YM Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):7043-58. PubMed ID: 26632059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and 2D digital mammography using a hybrid performance test. Cockmartin L; Marshall NW; Van Ongeval C; Aerts G; Stalmans D; Zanca F; Shaheen E; De Keyzer F; Dance DR; Young KC; Bosmans H Phys Med Biol; 2015 May; 60(10):3939-58. PubMed ID: 25909596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Penalized maximum likelihood reconstruction for improved microcalcification detection in breast tomosynthesis. Das M; Gifford HC; O'Connor JM; Glick SJ IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Apr; 30(4):904-14. PubMed ID: 21041158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Case for Wide-Angle Breast Tomosynthesis. Samei E; Thompson J; Richard S; Bowsher J Acad Radiol; 2015 Jul; 22(7):860-9. PubMed ID: 25920335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]