These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1961160)

  • 1. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 8172975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
    Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
    Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 8208220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
    Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
    Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computerized detection of masses from digitized mammograms: comparison of single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Dec; 2(12):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9419682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses.
    Yin FF; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Doi K; Schmidt RA
    Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 8320064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
    Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
    Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
    Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
    Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bilateral analysis scheme for false positive reduction in mammogram mass detection.
    Li Y; Chen H; Yang Y; Cheng L; Cao L
    Comput Biol Med; 2015 Feb; 57():84-95. PubMed ID: 25544726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis.
    Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Nov; 2(11):959-66. PubMed ID: 9419667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns.
    Tahoces PG; Correa J; Souto M; Gómez L; Vidal JJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jan; 40(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 7708834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
    Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robustness of computerized identification of masses in digitized mammograms. A preliminary assessment.
    Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
    Invest Radiol; 1996 Sep; 31(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 8877493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.