138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1961160)
1. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: analysis of bilateral subtraction images.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Metz CE; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1991; 18(5):955-63. PubMed ID: 1961160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: investigation of feature-analysis techniques.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
J Digit Imaging; 1994 Feb; 7(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 8172975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer-aided diagnosis: automatic detection of malignant masses in digitized mammograms.
Méndez AJ; Tahoces PG; Lado MJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 9650186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized detection of masses in digital mammograms: automated alignment of breast images and its effect on bilateral-subtraction technique.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Doi K; Vyborny CJ; Schmidt RA
Med Phys; 1994 Mar; 21(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 8208220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A method to test the reproducibility and to improve performance of computer-aided detection schemes for digitized mammograms.
Zheng B; Gur D; Good WF; Hardesty LA
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):2964-72. PubMed ID: 15587648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computerized detection of masses from digitized mammograms: comparison of single-image segmentation and bilateral-image subtraction.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Dec; 2(12):1056-61. PubMed ID: 9419682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of bilateral-subtraction and single-image processing techniques in the computerized detection of mammographic masses.
Yin FF; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Doi K; Schmidt RA
Invest Radiol; 1993 Jun; 28(6):473-81. PubMed ID: 8320064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement of computerized mass detection on mammograms: fusion of two-view information.
Paquerault S; Petrick N; Chan HP; Sahiner B; Helvie MA
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 11865995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A bilateral analysis scheme for false positive reduction in mammogram mass detection.
Li Y; Chen H; Yang Y; Cheng L; Cao L
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Feb; 57():84-95. PubMed ID: 25544726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized detection of masses in digitized mammograms using single-image segmentation and a multilayer topographic feature analysis.
Zheng B; Chang YH; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 1995 Nov; 2(11):959-66. PubMed ID: 9419667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns.
Tahoces PG; Correa J; Souto M; Gómez L; Vidal JJ
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jan; 40(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 7708834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Features of prospectively overlooked computer-aided detection marks on prior screening digital mammograms in women with breast cancer.
Cho N; Kim SJ; Choi HY; Lyou CY; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Nov; 195(5):1276-82. PubMed ID: 20966340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robustness of computerized identification of masses in digitized mammograms. A preliminary assessment.
Chang YH; Zheng B; Gur D
Invest Radiol; 1996 Sep; 31(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 8877493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views.
Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):695-701. PubMed ID: 17114620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
