119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1961287)
1. A patient review of the ESRD program: Part II.
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 May; 5(5):18-24, 27. PubMed ID: 1961287
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A patient review of the ESRD program: Part I.
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 Apr; 5(4):22-7. PubMed ID: 1961282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. IOM study released; calls for up to $640 million more for ESRD, transplant patients.
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 May; 5(5):11, 14-6. PubMed ID: 1961285
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Trying to measure quality? Ask the patient.
Sadler JH
Nephrol News Issues; 1996 Oct; 10(10):19, 28. PubMed ID: 9025494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The IOM report: an A+ for effort, but will it survive Washington's budget-cutting mood?
Hull AR
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 May; 5(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 1961288
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Delivery of care.
Cooper L
Nephrol News Issues; 2002 Aug; 16(9):62-3, 66. PubMed ID: 12229098
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ESRD regulatory landscape: a primer & resource. Part 2.
Robers S
Nephrol News Issues; 2003 Jan; 17(2):22-5. PubMed ID: 12629824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hazards to patients in a teaching hospital.
Hershkowitz M
Med Health R I; 2006 Nov; 89(11):368-9. PubMed ID: 17168086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicare cuts: hopefully gone, but more likely, not forgotten (by Washington).
Rubin R
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 Apr; 5(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 1961278
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A fresh approach to measuring quality care.
Neumann ME
Nephrol News Issues; 1991 Jun; 5(6):5, 55. PubMed ID: 1961304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. New dialysis-specific COOP charts may improve ESRD patient assessment.
Sadler JH; Blagg CR; Wasson JH
Nephrol News Issues; 1998 Sep; 12(9):41-2. PubMed ID: 9923296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Rate reductions could affect patient outcomes, study says.
Wagner L
Mod Healthc; 1991 Apr; 21(16):12. PubMed ID: 10110117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring and improving the health status of end stage renal disease patients.
Rettig RA; Sadler JH
Health Care Financ Rev; 1997; 18(4):77-82. PubMed ID: 10175614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the IOM perspective to the networks' approach to QA.
McClellan W
Nephrol News Issues; 1992 Feb; 6(2):44-6. PubMed ID: 1557154
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is it time again for patient selection criteria?
Price CA
Nephrol News Issues; 1992 Feb; 6(2):18-20. PubMed ID: 1290483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An IOM view: ethical issues in dialytic care need addressing.
Rettig RA; Cassel CK; Moss AH
Nephrol News Issues; 1992 Feb; 6(2):21-3. PubMed ID: 1557143
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Managed care is not the "cure-all" for improving quality and controlling costs in ESRD.
Amerling R
Nephrol News Issues; 1999 Apr; 13(4):46-7. PubMed ID: 10418448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The IOM report unequal treatment: lessons for clinical practice.
Betancourt JR; Maina AW; Soni SM
Del Med J; 2005 Sep; 77(9):339-48. PubMed ID: 16231664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. IOM highlights health disparities: implications for health plans.
Betancourt JR
Healthplan; 2002; 43(4):30-3, 36. PubMed ID: 12221774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction in ESRD reimbursement rate: identifying research priorities and quality indicators.
Parker J
ANNA J; 1990 Apr; 17(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 2183724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
