These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Fertility needs and funding in couples with blood-borne viral infection. Kalu E; Wood R; Vourliotis M; Gilling-Smith C HIV Med; 2010 Jan; 11(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 19732177 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Welcome to the wild west: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States. Mutcherson KM Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2012; 22(2):349-393.. PubMed ID: 25330565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modes of conception and multiple pregnancy: a national survey of babies born during one week in 2003 in the United Kingdom. Bardis N; Maruthini D; Balen AH Fertil Steril; 2005 Dec; 84(6):1727-32. PubMed ID: 16359972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register. Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L; Fertil Steril; 2011 Feb; 95(2):542-7.e1-10. PubMed ID: 20656287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: implications for access, equity and regulations. Whittaker A Reprod Health Matters; 2011 May; 19(37):107-16. PubMed ID: 21555091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cross-border reproductive care: a committee opinion. Ethics Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):645-50. PubMed ID: 23523262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Ferraretti AP; Pennings G; Gianaroli L; Natali F; Magli MC Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Feb; 20(2):261-6. PubMed ID: 20113964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; Dyer S; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1536-51. PubMed ID: 24795090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Challenges of fertility treatment in the UK. Templeton A BJOG; 2004 Nov; 111(11):1161-2. PubMed ID: 15521858 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Secular evolution and evolution according to autonomous communities of the frequency of fertility treatments, multiple deliveries and cesarean sections in Spain]. Martínez-Frías ML; Bermejo E; Rodríguez-Pinilla E; Dequino G; Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Feb; 124(4):132-9. PubMed ID: 15713242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trends in embryo-transfer practice and in outcomes of the use of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Jain T; Missmer SA; Hornstein MD N Engl J Med; 2004 Apr; 350(16):1639-45. PubMed ID: 15084696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Obesity in pregnancy: a study of the impact of maternal obesity on NHS maternity services. Heslehurst N; Lang R; Rankin J; Wilkinson JR; Summerbell CD BJOG; 2007 Mar; 114(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 17261124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Does a surgical career affect a woman's childbearing and fertility? A report on pregnancy and fertility trends among female surgeons. Phillips EA; Nimeh T; Braga J; Lerner LB J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Nov; 219(5):944-50. PubMed ID: 25260684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]