569 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19615576)
1. Comparison of fixation stability of resorbable versus titanium plate and screws in mandibular angle fractures.
Bayram B; Araz K; Uckan S; Balcik C
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1644-8. PubMed ID: 19615576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of different mandibular fracture patterns on the stability of miniplate screw fixation in angle mandibular fractures.
Pektas ZO; Bayram B; Balcik C; Develi T; Uckan S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 41(3):339-43. PubMed ID: 22178275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Strength analysis of titanium and resorbable internal fixation in a mandibulotomy model.
Ricalde P; Engroff SL; Von Fraunhofer JA; Posnick JC
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Aug; 63(8):1180-3. PubMed ID: 16094588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of stability of 2.0 mm standard and 2.0 mm locking miniplate/screws for the fixation of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on sheep mandibles.
Oguz Y; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D; Uckan S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 49(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 20226575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative biomechanical evaluation of mandibular condyle fracture plating techniques.
Asprino L; Consani S; de Moraes M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Mar; 64(3):452-6. PubMed ID: 16487808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: titanium versus resorbable plates and screws for maxillary fixation.
Costa F; Robiony M; Zorzan E; Zerman N; Politi M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Apr; 64(4):642-51. PubMed ID: 16546644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical comparison of plating techniques for fractures of the mandibular condyle.
Alkan A; Metin M; Muğlali M; Ozden B; Celebi N
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 16777278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical evaluation of titanium, biodegradable plate and screw, and cyanoacrylate glue fixation systems in craniofacial surgery.
Gosain AK; Song L; Corrao MA; Pintar FA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Mar; 101(3):582-91. PubMed ID: 9500375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of a new technique of mandibular angle fractures: biplanar and bicortical superior proximal 3 holes and bicortical inferior plate fixation.
Turgut G; Kayali MU; Soydan AT; Gündüz O; Salman S; Oktar F; Baş L
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 18362721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strength analysis of Le Fort I osteotomy fixation: titanium versus resorbable plates.
Araujo MM; Waite PD; Lemons JE
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Sep; 59(9):1034-9; discussion 1039-40. PubMed ID: 11526573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of stability of titanium and absorbable plate and screw fixation for mandibular angle fractures.
Esen A; Ataoğlu H; Gemi L
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):806-11. PubMed ID: 18718777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of malleable noncompression miniplates in mandibular angle fractures: an experimental study.
Esen A; Dolanmaz D; Tüz HH
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jul; 50(5):e65-8. PubMed ID: 22118919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Mechanical Stabilization of the Mandibular Angulus Fracture Fixation, With Titanium Plates and Screws, Resorbable Plates and Screws, and Bone Adhesives.
Cural Ü; Atalay B; Yildirim MS
J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1780-1787. PubMed ID: 30113419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
