203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19615600)
1. Evaluating impacted molars: augmenting traditional imaging studies.
Friedlander AH; Yueh R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1776-7. PubMed ID: 19615600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars.
Friedland B; Donoff B; Dodson TB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1678-85. PubMed ID: 18634957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship of the inferior alveolar canal to impacted third molars as evaluated by cone beam computed tomography.
Barayan M; Ahmad M
Northwest Dent; 2013; 92(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 23516718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative evaluation of film and digital panoramic radiographs in the assessment of position and morphology of impacted mandibular third molars.
Mahesh MS; Mahima VG; Patil K
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 21891889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Vlijmen OJ; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 40(8):834-9. PubMed ID: 21507612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings.
Tantanapornkul W; Okochi K; Bhakdinaronk A; Ohbayashi N; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Jan; 38(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 19114418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of orthopantomography and computed tomography image for assessing the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and mandibular canal.
Katakam SK; Shankar U; Thakur D; Reddy TP; Hari KR; Janga D
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Nov; 13(6):819-23. PubMed ID: 23404009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction.
Maegawa H; Sano K; Kitagawa Y; Ogasawara T; Miyauchi K; Sekine J; Inokuchi T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Nov; 96(5):639-46. PubMed ID: 14600702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of orthopantomographs and conventional tomography images for assessing the relationship between impacted lower third molars and the mandibular canal.
de Melo Albert DG; Gomes AC; do Egito Vasconcelos BC; de Oliveira e Silva ED; Holanda GZ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1030-7. PubMed ID: 16781335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of two enhancement tools on the assessment of the relationship between third molars and the inferior alveolar canal.
Peixoto LR; Gonzaga AK; Melo SL; Pontual ML; Pontual Ados A; de Melo DP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):637-42. PubMed ID: 25887428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cone beam volume tomography: an imaging option for diagnosis of complex mandibular third molar anatomical relationships.
Danforth RA; Peck J; Hall P
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2003 Nov; 31(11):847-52. PubMed ID: 14696837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative computed tomography imaging in the management of impacted mandibular third molars.
Susarla SM; Dodson TB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 65(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 17174769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 3-Dimensional imaging for lower third molars: is there an implication for surgical removal?
Eyrich G; Seifert B; Matthews F; Matthiessen U; Heusser CK; Kruse AL; Obwegeser JA; Lübbers HT
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):1867-72. PubMed ID: 21419547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography findings in preoperative examination of impacted mandibular third molars.
Peker I; Sarikir C; Alkurt MT; Zor ZF
BMC Oral Health; 2014 Jun; 14():71. PubMed ID: 24928108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography.
Ghaeminia H; Meijer GJ; Soehardi A; Borstlap WA; Mulder J; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 38(9):964-71. PubMed ID: 19640685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars.
Kaeppler G
Quintessence Int; 2000 Jan; 31(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 11203906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sagittal split osteotomy in removal of impacted third molar.
Toffanin A; Zupi A; Cicognini A
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 May; 61(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 12730848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Correlation of panoramic radiographs and spiral CT scan in the preoperative assessment of intimacy of the inferior alveolar canal to impacted mandibular third molars.
Khan I; Halli R; Gadre P; Gadre KS
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):566-70. PubMed ID: 21403569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inferior alveolar nerve canal and branches detected with dental cone beam computed tomography in lower third molar region.
Yamada T; Ishihama K; Yasuda K; Hasumi-Nakayama Y; Ito K; Yamaoka M; Furusawa K
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1278-82. PubMed ID: 21256640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anatomy of impacted lower third molars evaluated by computerized tomography: is there an indication for 3-dimensional imaging?
Lübbers HT; Matthews F; Damerau G; Kruse AL; Obwegeser JA; Grätz KW; Eyrich GK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 May; 111(5):547-50. PubMed ID: 20952229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
