These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19615643)

  • 1. A posteriori registration and subtraction of panoramic compared with intraoral radiography.
    Deserno TM; Rangarajan JR; Hoffmann J; Brägger U; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):e39-45. PubMed ID: 19615643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of JPEG lossy image compression on quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 12076050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between panoramic digital and digitized images to detect simulated periapical lesions using radiographic subtraction.
    Miguens SA; Veeck EB; Fontanella VR; da Costa NP
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1500-3. PubMed ID: 19026882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative evaluation of JPEG and JPEG2000 compression in quantitative digital subtraction radiography.
    Fidler A; Likar B; Pernus F; Skaleric U
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Nov; 31(6):379-84. PubMed ID: 12424637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11280366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Initial evaluation of linear and spatially oriented planar images from a new dental panoramic system based on tomosynthesis.
    Katsumata A; Ogawa K; Inukai K; Matsuoka M; Nagano T; Nagaoka H; Yamakawa T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 21827959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Automatic correspondence using the enhanced hexagonal centre-based inner search algorithm for point-based dental image registration.
    Economopoulos T; Matsopoulos GK; Asvestas PA; Gröndahl K; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 May; 37(4):185-204. PubMed ID: 18460572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of radiographic bone height assessments in panoramic and intraoral radiographs of implant patients.
    Kullman L; Al-Asfour A; Zetterqvist L; Andersson L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):96-100. PubMed ID: 17340902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detection of periodontal bone loss using digital intraoral and cone beam computed tomography images: an in vitro assessment of bony and/or infrabony defects.
    Vandenberghe B; Jacobs R; Yang J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):252-60. PubMed ID: 18606746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proximal caries detection accuracy using intraoral bitewing radiography, extraoral bitewing radiography and panoramic radiography.
    Kamburoglu K; Kolsuz E; Murat S; Yüksel S; Ozen T
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):450-9. PubMed ID: 22868296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rotational panoramic versus intraoral rectangular radiographs for evaluation of peri-implant bone loss in the anterior atrophic mandible.
    Zechner W; Watzak G; Gahleitner A; Busenlechner D; Tepper G; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):873-8. PubMed ID: 14696663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.
    Mengel R; Kruse B; Flores-de-Jacoby L
    J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1234-41. PubMed ID: 16805688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
    Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Descriptive study of mandibular canal visibility: morphometric and densitometric analysis for digital panoramic radiographs.
    Kubilius M; Kubilius R; Varinauskas V; Žalinkevičius R; Tözüm TF; Juodžbalys G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160079. PubMed ID: 27167456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality of two solid-state and three photostimulable phosphor plate digital panoramic systems, and treatment planning of mandibular third molar removal.
    Benediktsdottir IS; Hintze H; Petersen JK; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Jan; 32(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 12820852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.