243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19615655)
1. Stability of locking and conventional 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: finite element analysis.
Oguz Y; Uckan S; Ozden AU; Uckan E; Eser A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):174-7. PubMed ID: 19615655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of different fixation methods following sagittal split ramus osteotomies using three-dimensional finite elements analysis. Part 1: advancement surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jul; 34(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 16053877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional finite element analysis used to compare methods of fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: setback surgery-posterior loading.
Erkmen E; Simşek B; Yücel E; Kurt A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Apr; 43(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 15749208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Finite-element-analysis of different screw-diameters in the sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible.
Maurer P; Holweg S; Schubert J
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):365-72. PubMed ID: 10870755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stability of absorbable and titanium plate and screw fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Dolanmaz D; Uckan S; Isik K; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Apr; 42(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 15013544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro comparison of an adjustable bone fixation system.
Van Sickels JE; Peterson GP; Holms S; Haug RH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Nov; 63(11):1620-5. PubMed ID: 16243179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro comparison of biomechanical characteristics of sagittal split osteotomy fixation techniques.
Ozden B; Alkan A; Arici S; Erdem E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 35(9):837-41. PubMed ID: 16687240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized analysis of resorbable polymer plates and screws for the rigid fixation of mandibular angle fractures.
Cox T; Kohn MW; Impelluso T
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Apr; 61(4):481-7; discussion 487-8. PubMed ID: 12684967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of different miniplates for internal fixation of mandible fractures using finite element analysis.
Arbag H; Korkmaz HH; Ozturk K; Uyar Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 18486788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Experimental analysis of functional stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomies secured by miniplates and position screws.
Shetty V; Freymiller E; McBrearty D; Caputo AA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1996 Nov; 54(11):1317-24; discussion 1324-6. PubMed ID: 8941183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skeletal stability after mandibular setback surgery: bicortical fixation using a 2.0-mm locking plate system versus monocortical fixation using a nonlocking plate system.
Ueki K; Hashiba Y; Marukawa K; Alam S; Nakagawa K; Yamamoto E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 66(5):900-4. PubMed ID: 18423278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Appropriate diameter for screws to fix the maxilla following Le Fort I osteotomy: an investigation utilizing finite element analysis.
Nagasao T; Miyamoto J; Hikosaka M; Nagasao M; Tokumaru Y; Ogawa K; Nakajima T
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):227-33. PubMed ID: 17855106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different miniplates in fixation of fractured human mandible with the finite element method.
Korkmaz HH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jun; 103(6):e1-13. PubMed ID: 17468022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mechanical characteristics of the mandible after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: comparing 2 different fixation techniques.
Chuong CJ; Borotikar B; Schwartz-Dabney C; Sinn DP
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 15635560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comperative evaluation of the current and new design miniplate fixation techniques of the advanced sagittal split ramus osteotomy using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Altuncu F; Kazan D; Özden B
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2023 Nov; 28(6):e553-e561. PubMed ID: 37823299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Stability of screw fixation following sagittal splitting osteotomy of the mandibular ramus].
Eba M
Meikai Daigaku Shigaku Zasshi; 1990; 19(3):356-76. PubMed ID: 2134896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of the angle of the screw on the stability of the mandibular sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a study in sheep mandibles.
Uckan S; Schwimmer A; Kummer F; Greenberg AM
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Aug; 39(4):266-8. PubMed ID: 11437421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.
Edwards RC; Kiely KD; Eppley BL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Mar; 59(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 11243608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of a thin HA coating on the stress/strain distribution in bone around dental implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Aoki H; Ozeki K; Ohtani Y; Fukui Y; Asaoka T
Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 16518015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Immediate mechanical stability of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixed with resorbable compared with titanium bicortical screws in mandibles of sheep.
Cilasun U; Uckan S; Dolanmaz D; Saglam H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 44(6):534-7. PubMed ID: 16423434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
