164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19616830)
1. Extrafascial versus interfascial nerve-sparing technique for robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: comparison of functional outcomes and positive surgical margins characteristics.
Shikanov S; Woo J; Al-Ahmadie H; Katz MH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL; Zorn KC
Urology; 2009 Sep; 74(3):611-6. PubMed ID: 19616830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Steinberg GP; Taxy JB; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2008 Jun; 22(6):1303-9. PubMed ID: 18484875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional and oncologic outcomes comparing interfascial and intrafascial nerve sparing in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies.
Potdevin L; Ercolani M; Jeong J; Kim IY
J Endourol; 2009 Sep; 23(9):1479-84. PubMed ID: 19694530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stepwise approach for nerve sparing without countertraction during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: technique and outcomes.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Ulmer WD; Kaplan JR; Patel S; Nguyen PL; Hu JC
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):536-47. PubMed ID: 21620561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pathological confirmation of nerve-sparing types performed during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Ko WJ; Hruby GW; Turk AT; Landman J; Badani KK
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3):451-8. PubMed ID: 22900712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation.
Zorn KC; Gofrit ON; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
Eur Urol; 2007 Mar; 51(3):755-62; discussion 763. PubMed ID: 17084520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Bernstein AJ; Gofrit ON; Shikanov SA; Mikhail AA; Song DH; Zagaja GP; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):1005-12. PubMed ID: 18419333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apical surgical margins status in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy does not depend on disease characteristics.
Tsivian M; Zilberman DE; Ferrandino MN; Madden JF; Mouraviev V; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2012 Apr; 26(4):361-5. PubMed ID: 22192106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oncologic results, functional outcomes, and complication rates of transperitoneal robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: single centre's experience.
Ihsan-Tasci A; Simsek A; Dogukan-Torer MB; Sokmen D; Sahin S; Bitkin A; Tugcu V
Actas Urol Esp; 2015 Mar; 39(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 24856651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kumar A; Samavedi S; Bates AS; Mouraviev V; Coelho RF; Rocco B; Patel VR
J Robot Surg; 2017 Jun; 11(2):129-138. PubMed ID: 27435701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Superior quality of life and improved surgical margins are achievable with robotic radical prostatectomy after a long learning curve: a prospective single-surgeon study of 1552 consecutive cases.
Thompson JE; Egger S; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Rasiah K; Stricker PD
Eur Urol; 2014 Mar; 65(3):521-31. PubMed ID: 24287319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Anatomical grades of nerve sparing: a risk-stratified approach to neural-hammock sparing during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP).
Tewari AK; Srivastava A; Huang MW; Robinson BD; Shevchuk MM; Durand M; Sooriakumaran P; Grover S; Yadav R; Mishra N; Mohan S; Brooks DC; Shaikh N; Khanna A; Leung R
BJU Int; 2011 Sep; 108(6 Pt 2):984-92. PubMed ID: 21917101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robot-assisted or pure laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: what is the optimal procedure for the surgical margins? A single center experience.
Koutlidis N; Mourey E; Champigneulle J; Mangin P; Cormier L
Int J Urol; 2012 Dec; 19(12):1076-81. PubMed ID: 22860572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.
Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impacting factors for recovery of erectile function within 1 year following robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.
Ko WJ; Truesdale MD; Hruby GW; Landman J; Badani KK
J Sex Med; 2011 Jun; 8(6):1805-12. PubMed ID: 21426493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of minimizing tension during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on urinary function recovery.
Kowalczyk KJ; Huang AC; Hevelone ND; Lipsitz SR; Yu HY; Lynch JH; Hu JC
World J Urol; 2013 Jun; 31(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 23135639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of positive surgical margin rates in high risk prostate cancer: open versus minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.
Harty NJ; Kozinn SI; Canes D; Sorcini A; Moinzadeh A
Int Braz J Urol; 2013; 39(5):639-46; discussion 647-8. PubMed ID: 24267107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
