255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19616909)
61. Model-based iterative reconstruction in pediatric chest CT: assessment of image quality in a prospective study of children with cystic fibrosis.
Miéville FA; Berteloot L; Grandjean A; Ayestaran P; Gudinchet F; Schmidt S; Brunelle F; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):558-67. PubMed ID: 23224105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparison of Digital Tomosynthesis and Chest Radiography for the Detection of Noncalcified Pulmonary and Hilar Lesions.
Galea A; Adlan T; Gay D; Roobottom C; Dubbins P; Riordan R
J Thorac Imaging; 2015 Sep; 30(5):328-35. PubMed ID: 25844978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Dependency of image quality on acquisition protocol and image processing in chest tomosynthesis-a visual grading study based on clinical data.
Jadidi M; Båth M; Nyrén S
Br J Radiol; 2018 Jul; 91(1087):20170683. PubMed ID: 29565673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. [Good image quality and reduced radiation dose for thoracic-CT].
Bischoff M
Rofo; 2013 Nov; 185(11):1030-1. PubMed ID: 24308051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Role of compressive sensing technique in dose reduction for chest computed tomography: a prospective blinded clinical study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Lira D; Bippus R; Do S; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Koehler T; Shepard JA; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):760-7. PubMed ID: 24834892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Systematic error in lung nodule volumetry: effect of iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection at different CT parameters.
Willemink MJ; Leiner T; Budde RP; de Kort FP; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PM; Oudkerk M; de Jong PA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Dec; 199(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 23169714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Solid, part-solid, or non-solid?: classification of pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest computed tomography by a computer-aided diagnosis system.
Jacobs C; van Rikxoort EM; Scholten ET; de Jong PA; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 25478740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Recent advances in chest radiography.
McAdams HP; Samei E; Dobbins J; Tourassi GD; Ravin CE
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):663-83. PubMed ID: 17114619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. A free-response evaluation determining value in the computed tomography attenuation correction image for revealing pulmonary incidental findings: a phantom study.
Thompson JD; Hogg P; Manning DJ; Szczepura K; Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 24594424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A computerized scheme for lung nodule detection in multiprojection chest radiography.
Guo W; Li Q; Boyce SJ; McAdams HP; Shiraishi J; Doi K; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2001-12. PubMed ID: 22482621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: summary of the RADIUS chest trial.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):114-20. PubMed ID: 15933091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Multiple diagnostic task performance in CT examination of the chest.
Schartz KM; Berbaum KS; Madsen MT; Thompson BH; Mullan BF; Caldwell RT; Hammett B; Ellingson AN; Franken EA
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):18244135. PubMed ID: 22960243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Commentary on: Comparison of chest digital tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of asbestos-related pleuropulmonary disease.
Vlahos I
Clin Radiol; 2013 Apr; 68(4):336-7. PubMed ID: 23347468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. An Optimized Superpixel Clustering Approach for High-Resolution Chest CT Image Segmentation.
Pinheiro da Rosa R; Cordeiro d'Ornellas M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():1045. PubMed ID: 26262344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Dose reduction and image quality improvement of chest radiography by using bone-suppression technique and low tube voltage: a phantom study.
Takagi S; Yaegashi T; Ishikawa M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jan; 30(1):571-580. PubMed ID: 31385049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Pulmonary nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis.
Johnsson ÅA; Fagman E; Vikgren J; Fisichella VA; Boijsen M; Flinck A; Kheddache S; Svalkvist A; Båth M
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):273-82. PubMed ID: 22993220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. VISIBILITY OF STRUCTURES OF RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS WITH CYSTIC FIBROSIS IN CHEST TOMOSYNTHESIS: INFLUENCE OF ANATOMICAL LOCATION AND OBSERVER EXPERIENCE.
Meltzer C; Båth M; Kheddache S; Ásgeirsdóttir H; Gilljam M; Johnsson ÅA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):177-87. PubMed ID: 26842827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
