These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1961774)
1. The how and why of what went where in apparent motion: modeling solutions to the motion correspondence problem. Dawson MR Psychol Rev; 1991 Oct; 98(4):569-603. PubMed ID: 1961774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of element orientation on apparent motion perception. Werkhoven P; Snippe HP; Koenderink JJ Percept Psychophys; 1990 Jun; 47(6):509-25. PubMed ID: 2367172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The perception of biological motion across apertures. Shiffrar M; Lichtey L; Heptulla Chatterjee S Percept Psychophys; 1997 Jan; 59(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9038407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Percepts of rigid motion within and across apertures. Shiffrar M; Pavel M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):749-61. PubMed ID: 1834788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Apparent motion: evidence of the influence of shape, slant, and size on the correspondence process. Mack A; Klein L; Hill J; Palumbo D Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 2762108 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local-level and global-level form characteristics in apparent-motion correspondence. Palmer T; Tzeng OJ; He S Perception; 1995; 24(11):1233-45. PubMed ID: 8643329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What determines correspondence strength in apparent motion? Green M Vision Res; 1986; 26(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 3739235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differential activation solution to the motion correspondence problem. Gilroy LA; Hock HS; Ploeger A Percept Psychophys; 2001 Jul; 63(5):847-61. PubMed ID: 11521851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Configural processing in the perception of apparent biological motion. Chatterjee SH; Freyd JJ; Shiffrar M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1996 Aug; 22(4):916-29. PubMed ID: 8756959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attentional tracking in the perception of apparent motion: evidence from sequential blanking displays. Gellatly A; Blurton A Q J Exp Psychol A; 1995 Feb; 48(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 7754086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Tittle JS; Braunstein ML Percept Psychophys; 1993 Aug; 54(2):157-69. PubMed ID: 8361830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. Halpern AR; Kelly MH J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Mar; 19(2):471-84. PubMed ID: 8454967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Perceived causality occurs with stroboscopic movement of one or both stimulus elements. Gordon IE; Day RH; Stecher EJ Perception; 1990; 19(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 2336330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why do parallel cortical systems exist for the perception of static form and moving form? Grossberg S Percept Psychophys; 1991 Feb; 49(2):117-41. PubMed ID: 2017350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cross-modal slant and curvature matching of stereo- and motion-induced surfaces. de Vries SC; Werkhoven P Percept Psychophys; 1995 Nov; 57(8):1175-86. PubMed ID: 8539092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Todd JT; Perotti VJ Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1577-89. PubMed ID: 10598471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]