These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19618292)
1. Refining deliberation in bioethics. Kottow M Med Health Care Philos; 2009 Nov; 12(4):393-7. PubMed ID: 19618292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pragmatism, metaphysics, and bioethics: beyond a theory of moral deliberation. Pamental M J Med Philos; 2013 Dec; 38(6):725-42. PubMed ID: 23878348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. From applied ethics to empirical ethics to contextual ethics. Hoffmaster B Bioethics; 2018 Feb; 32(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 29280167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioethical decision-making: a reply to Ackerman. Basson MD J Med Philos; 1983 May; 8(2):181-5. PubMed ID: 6886574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bioethics education in clinical settings: theory and practice of the dilemma method of moral case deliberation. Stolper M; Molewijk B; Widdershoven G BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Jul; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 27448597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The limited relevance of analytical ethics to the problems of bioethics. Holmes RL J Med Philos; 1990 Apr; 15(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 2351891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics as methodological case resolution: specification, specified principlism and casuistry. Iltis AS J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):271-84. PubMed ID: 10852335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Freestanding pragmatism in law and bioethics. Arras JD Theor Med Bioeth; 2001; 22(2):69-85. PubMed ID: 11437273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Theological discourse and the postmodern condition: the case of bioethics. Dell'Oro R Med Health Care Philos; 2002; 5(2):127-36. PubMed ID: 12168988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Interpretive bioethics: the way of discernment. Carson RA Theor Med; 1990 Mar; 11(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 2339334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bioethics as public discourse and second-order discipline. Kopelman LM J Med Philos; 2009 Jun; 34(3):261-73. PubMed ID: 19387001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong on specification. Jonsen AR J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):348-60. PubMed ID: 10852338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Autonomy, discourse, and power: a postmodern reflection on principlism and bioethics. McGrath P J Med Philos; 1998 Aug; 23(5):516-32. PubMed ID: 9892038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On the possibility of a pragmatic discourse bioethics: Putnam, Habermas, and the normative logic of bioethical inquiry. Cooke EF J Med Philos; 2003; 28(5-6):635-53. PubMed ID: 14972765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reply to Strong on principlism and casuistry. Beauchamp TL J Med Philos; 2000 Jun; 25(3):342-7. PubMed ID: 11023381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical case deliberation and decision making. Gracia D Med Health Care Philos; 2003; 6(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 14620459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does ethical theory have a future in bioethics? Beauchamp TL J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(2):209-17, 190. PubMed ID: 15301185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]