These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19618786)
1. Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population. Shebl F; Poppell CE; Zhan M; Dwyer DM; Hopkins AB; Groves C; Reed F; Devadason C; Steinberger EK Public Health Rep; 2009; 124(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 19618786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Telephone coverage and health survey estimates: evaluating the need for concern about wireless substitution. Blumberg SJ; Luke JV; Cynamon ML Am J Public Health; 2006 May; 96(5):926-31. PubMed ID: 16571707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013. Dal Grande E; Chittleborough CR; Campostrini S; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Apr; 16():44. PubMed ID: 27089889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Surveying alcohol and other drug use through telephone sampling: a comparison of landline and mobile phone samples. Livingston M; Dietze P; Ferris J; Pennay D; Hayes L; Lenton S BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Mar; 13():41. PubMed ID: 23497161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recruitment using mobile telephones in an Irish general population sexual health survey: challenges and practical solutions. McBride O; Morgan K; McGee H BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Apr; 12():45. PubMed ID: 22475155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reevaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. Blumberg SJ; Luke JV Am J Public Health; 2009 Oct; 99(10):1806-10. PubMed ID: 19696381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sampling and coverage issues of telephone surveys used for collecting health information in Australia: results from a face-to-face survey from 1999 to 2008. Dal Grande E; Taylor AW BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Aug; 10():77. PubMed ID: 20738884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Profiling the mobile-only population in Australia: insights from the Australian National Health Survey. Baffour B; Haynes M; Dinsdale S; Western M; Pennay D Aust N Z J Public Health; 2016 Oct; 40(5):443-447. PubMed ID: 27372061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Home landline telephone coverage and potential bias in epidemiological surveys. Bernal R; Silva NN Rev Saude Publica; 2009 Jun; 43(3):421-6. PubMed ID: 19377748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Including mobile-only telephone users in a statewide preventive health survey-Differences in the prevalence of health risk factors and impact on trends. Baffour B; Roselli T; Haynes M; Bon JJ; Western M; Clemens S Prev Med Rep; 2017 Sep; 7():91-98. PubMed ID: 28593128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing cell phone usage among Hispanics: implications for telephone surveys. Lee S; Elkasabi M; Streja L Am J Public Health; 2012 Jun; 102(6):e19-24. PubMed ID: 22515863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inclusion of mobile phone numbers into an ongoing population health survey in New South Wales, Australia: design, methods, call outcomes, costs and sample representativeness. Barr ML; van Ritten JJ; Steel DG; Thackway SV BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Nov; 12():177. PubMed ID: 23173849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Growing cell-phone population and noncoverage bias in traditional random digit dial telephone health surveys. Lee S; Brick JM; Brown ER; Grant D Health Serv Res; 2010 Aug; 45(4):1121-39. PubMed ID: 20500221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Potential selection bias in telephone surveys: landline and mobile phones]. Garcia-Continente X; Pérez-Giménez A; López MJ; Nebot M Gac Sanit; 2014; 28(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 24300381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in sociodemographic, health status, and lifestyle characteristics among American Indians by telephone coverage. Pearson D; Cheadle A; Wagner E; Tonsberg R; Psaty BM Prev Med; 1994 Jul; 23(4):461-4. PubMed ID: 7971873 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Telephone coverage and measurement of health risk indicators: data from the National Health Interview Survey. Anderson JE; Nelson DE; Wilson RW Am J Public Health; 1998 Sep; 88(9):1392-5. PubMed ID: 9736886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of bias and logistics in a survey of adults at increased risk for oral health decrements. Gilbert GH; Duncan RP; Kulley AM; Coward RT; Heft MW J Public Health Dent; 1997; 57(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 9150063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of including cellular telephone numbers in random digit dialing for epidemiologic case-control studies. Voigt LF; Schwartz SM; Doody DR; Lee SC; Li CI Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Jan; 173(1):118-26. PubMed ID: 21071602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of data collected by telephone survey: a comparison of VIGITEL 2008 and 'Saúde em Beagá' survey. Ferreira AD; César CC; Malta DC; Andrade AC; Ramos CG; Proietti FA; Bernal RT; Caiaffa WT Rev Bras Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():16-30. PubMed ID: 22002139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of the mode of survey administration on estimates of daily smoking for mobile phone only users. Hanna J; Cordery DV; Steel DG; Davis W; Harrold TC BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):65. PubMed ID: 28427334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]