These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19619145)

  • 1. Mechanical reliability of AMS 700 CX improved by parylene coating.
    Salem EA; Wilson SK; Neeb A; Delk JR; Cleves MA
    J Sex Med; 2009 Sep; 6(9):2615-20. PubMed ID: 19619145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades.
    Wilson SK; Delk JR; Salem EA; Cleves MA
    J Sex Med; 2007 Jul; 4(4 Pt 1):1074-9. PubMed ID: 17627751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative revision rates of inflatable penile prostheses using woven Dacron® fabric cylinders.
    Enemchukwu EA; Kaufman MR; Whittam BM; Milam DF
    J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2189-93. PubMed ID: 23845458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cylinder aneurysm of parylene-coated American Medical System (AMS) 700CX penile prosthesis.
    Kaufman JM; Weldon TE
    J Sex Med; 2008 Nov; 5(11):2713-5. PubMed ID: 18761594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis has high mechanical reliability at long-term follow-up.
    Kim DS; Yang KM; Chung HJ; Choi HM; Choi YD; Choi HK
    J Sex Med; 2010 Jul; 7(7):2602-7. PubMed ID: 20384938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700 series inflatable penile prostheses: comparison of CX/CXM and Ultrex cylinders.
    Daitch JA; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ; Montague DK
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1400-2. PubMed ID: 9302130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term followup of treatment for Peyronie's disease: modeling the penis over an inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Wilson SK; Cleves MA; Delk JR
    J Urol; 2001 Mar; 165(3):825-9. PubMed ID: 11176479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term mechanical reliability of AMS 700CX/CXM inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Dhar NB; Angermeier KW; Montague DK
    J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2599-601; discussion 2601. PubMed ID: 17085168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Long-term experience with controlled expansion cylinders in the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis and comparison with earlier versions of the Scott inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Nickas ME; Kessler R; Kabalin JN
    Urology; 1994 Sep; 44(3):400-3. PubMed ID: 8073553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. AMS 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis implantation in men with Peyronie's disease: comparison of CX and Ultrex cylinders.
    Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Ingleright BJ
    J Urol; 1996 Nov; 156(5):1633-5. PubMed ID: 8863557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Plasma-enhanced parylene coating for medical device applications.
    Bienkiewicz J
    Med Device Technol; 2006; 17(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 16483103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.
    Natali A; Olianas R; Fisch M
    J Sex Med; 2008 Jun; 5(6):1503-12. PubMed ID: 18410306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical reliability of AMS hydraulic penile prostheses.
    Kim SC
    J Korean Med Sci; 1995 Dec; 10(6):422-5. PubMed ID: 8924226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mechanical failure of the American Medical Systems Ultrex inflatable penile prosthesis: before and after 1993 structural modification.
    Milbank AJ; Montague DK; Angermeier KW; Lakin MM; Worley SE
    J Urol; 2002 Jun; 167(6):2502-6. PubMed ID: 11992067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical experience with controlled expansion cylinders. The AMS 700 CX inflatable penile prosthesis.
    Furlow WL; Knoll LD
    Urol Clin North Am; 1989 Feb; 16(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 2916279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inflatable penile prosthesis as tissue expander: what is the evidence?
    Chung PH; Siegel JA; Tausch TJ; Klein AK; Scott JM; Morey AF
    Int Braz J Urol; 2017; 43(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 28537700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An outcomes analysis of over 200 revision surgeries for penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter study.
    Henry GD; Donatucci CF; Conners W; Greenfield JM; Carson CC; Wilson SK; Delk J; Lentz AC; Cleves MA; Jennermann CJ; Kramer AC
    J Sex Med; 2012 Jan; 9(1):309-15. PubMed ID: 22082149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Long-term bilayer encapsulation performance of atomic layer deposited Al₂O₃ and Parylene C for biomedical implantable devices.
    Xie X; Rieth L; Caldwell R; Diwekar M; Tathireddy P; Sharma R; Solzbacher F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 60(10):2943-51. PubMed ID: 23751949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Infection rates of rifampin/gentamicin-coated Titan Coloplast penile implants. Comparison with Inhibizone-impregnated AMS penile implants.
    Dhabuwala C; Sheth S; Zamzow B
    J Sex Med; 2011 Jan; 8(1):315-20. PubMed ID: 20946163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term results with Hydroflex and Dynaflex penile prostheses: device survival comparison to multicomponent inflatables.
    Wilson SK; Cleves M; Delk JR
    J Urol; 1996 May; 155(5):1621-3. PubMed ID: 8627837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.