438 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19619349)
1. Methods, procedures, and contextual characteristics of health technology assessment and health policy decision making: comparison of health technology assessment agencies in Germany, United Kingdom, France, and Sweden.
Schwarzer R; Siebert U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 19619349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reflections on the evolution of health technology assessment in Europe.
Sorenson C; Chalkidou K
Health Econ Policy Law; 2012 Jan; 7(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 22221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluations conducted by Canadian health technology assessment agencies: where do we stand?
Tarride JE; McCarron CE; Lim M; Bowen JM; Blackhouse G; Hopkins R; O'Reilly D; Xie F; Goeree R
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 18828938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment agencies: an international overview of organizational aspects.
Martelli F; La Torre G; Di Ghionno E; Staniscia T; Neroni M; Cicchetti A; Von Bremen K; Ricciardi W;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):414-24. PubMed ID: 17937828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health technology assessment of medical devices: What is different? An overview of three European projects.
Schnell-Inderst P; Mayer J; Lauterberg J; Hunger T; Arvandi M; Conrads-Frank A; Nachtnebel A; Wild C; Siebert U
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2015; 109(4-5):309-18. PubMed ID: 26354131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Health technology assessment of medical devices: a survey of non-European union agencies.
Ciani O; Wilcher B; Blankart CR; Hatz M; Rupel VP; Erker RS; Varabyova Y; Taylor RS
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2015 Jan; 31(3):154-65. PubMed ID: 26044729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia.
Gagnon MP; Sánchez E; Pons JM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16571192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A content analysis of Health Technology Assessment programs in Latin America.
Arellano LE; Reza M; Blasco JA; Andradas E
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):570-6. PubMed ID: 19845988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom.
Kreis J; Schmidt H
J Health Polit Policy Law; 2013 Feb; 38(1):89-122. PubMed ID: 23052686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Health technology assessment.
Hailey D
Singapore Med J; 2006 Mar; 47(3):187-92; quiz 193. PubMed ID: 16518551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of health technology assessment in coverage decisions on newborn screening.
Fischer KE; Grosse SD; Rogowski WH
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2011 Oct; 27(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 22004771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].
Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Apr; 74(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 21267815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Most important barriers and facilitators of HTA usage in decision-making in Europe.
Cheung KL; Evers SMAA; De Vries H; Levy P; Pokhrel S; Jones T; Danner M; Wentlandt J; Knufinke L; Mayer S; Hiligsmann M
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2018 Jun; 18(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 29303374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Health Technology Assessment: conceptual framework and international perspective].
Kuhn-Barrientos L
Rev Med Chil; 2014 Jan; 142 Suppl 1():S11-5. PubMed ID: 24861174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of archetypes for non-ranking classification and comparison of European National Health Technology Assessment systems.
Allen N; Pichler F; Wang T; Patel S; Salek S
Health Policy; 2013 Dec; 113(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 24176288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing Health Technology Assessment to address health care system needs.
Velasco Garrido M; Gerhardus A; Røttingen JA; Busse R
Health Policy; 2010 Mar; 94(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 19889471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
