230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19619391)
1. The influence of sex and empathy on putting oneself in the shoes of others.
Mohr C; Rowe AC; Blanke O
Br J Psychol; 2010 May; 101(Pt 2):277-91. PubMed ID: 19619391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Gender-specific strategy use and neural correlates in a spatial perspective taking task.
Kaiser S; Walther S; Nennig E; Kronmüller K; Mundt C; Weisbrod M; Stippich C; Vogeley K
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Aug; 46(10):2524-31. PubMed ID: 18514745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A lateralization of function approach to sex differences in spatial ability: a reexamination.
Rilea SL
Brain Cogn; 2008 Jul; 67(2):168-82. PubMed ID: 18291568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sex differences in components of imagined perspective transformation.
Gardner MR; Sorhus I; Edmonds CJ; Potts R
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22426425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sex and hemisphere differences when mentally rotating meaningful and meaningless stimuli.
Rilea SL
Laterality; 2008 May; 13(3):217-33. PubMed ID: 18449839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Neural correlates of first-person perspective as one constituent of human self-consciousness.
Vogeley K; May M; Ritzl A; Falkai P; Zilles K; Fink GR
J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):817-27. PubMed ID: 15200709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in spatial ability: a lateralization of function approach.
Rilea SL; Roskos-Ewoldsen B; Boles D
Brain Cogn; 2004 Dec; 56(3):332-43. PubMed ID: 15522772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hand dominance influences the processing of observed bodies.
Gardner MR; Potts R
Brain Cogn; 2010 Jun; 73(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 20338681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empathic and non-empathic routes to visuospatial perspective-taking.
Gronholm PC; Flynn M; Edmonds CJ; Gardner MR
Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):494-500. PubMed ID: 22221741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Perspective taking is associated with specific facial responses during empathy for pain.
Lamm C; Porges EC; Cacioppo JT; Decety J
Brain Res; 2008 Aug; 1227():153-61. PubMed ID: 18619426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Subjective time in near and far representational space.
Zäch P; Brugger P
Cogn Behav Neurol; 2008 Mar; 21(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 18327017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The handedness of imagined bodies in action and the role of perspective taking.
Marzoli D; Mitaritonna A; Moretto F; Carluccio P; Tommasi L
Brain Cogn; 2011 Feb; 75(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 21035936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of arm weight on C-not-B task performance: implications for the motor inhibitory deficit account of search failures.
Rivière J; Lécuyer R
J Exp Child Psychol; 2008 May; 100(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 18313688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Asymmetric learning transfer between imagined viewer- and object-rotations: evidence of a hierarchical organization of spatial reference frames.
Pellizzer G; Bâ MB; Zanello A; Merlo MC
Brain Cogn; 2009 Dec; 71(3):272-8. PubMed ID: 19748718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Visuospatial perspective taking in a dynamic environment: perceiving moving objects from a first-person-perspective induces a disposition to act.
Kockler H; Scheef L; Tepest R; David N; Bewernick BH; Newen A; Schild HH; May M; Vogeley K
Conscious Cogn; 2010 Sep; 19(3):690-701. PubMed ID: 20363157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The neural correlates of biomechanical constraints in hand laterality judgment task performed from other person's perspective: A near-infrared spectroscopy study.
Meng S; Oi M; Saito G; Saito H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0183818. PubMed ID: 28863149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Applications of mental rotation figures of the Shepard and Metzler type and description of a mental rotation stimulus library.
Peters M; Battista C
Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 17967499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does egocentric mental rotation elicit sex differences?
Seurinck R; Vingerhoets G; de Lange FP; Achten E
Neuroimage; 2004 Dec; 23(4):1440-9. PubMed ID: 15589108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Solving a mental rotation task in congenital hemiparesis: motor imagery versus visual imagery.
Steenbergen B; van Nimwegen M; Crajé C
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Nov; 45(14):3324-8. PubMed ID: 17706255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mental rotation does not account for sex differences in left-right confusion.
Ocklenburg S; Hirnstein M; Ohmann HA; Hausmann M
Brain Cogn; 2011 Jun; 76(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 21345568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
