These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19620636)

  • 21. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies.
    Morrison A; Polisena J; Husereau D; Moulton K; Clark M; Fiander M; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Clifford T; Hutton B; Rabb D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2012 Apr; 28(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 22559755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Publication bias in dermatology systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Atakpo P; Vassar M
    J Dermatol Sci; 2016 May; 82(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 26925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis.
    Bax L; Ikeda N; Fukui N; Yaju Y; Tsuruta H; Moons KG
    Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 169(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 19064649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The prevalence and effect of publication bias in orthopaedic meta-analyses.
    Vavken P; Dorotka R
    J Orthop Sci; 2011 Mar; 16(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 21360256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantifying the risk of error when interpreting funnel plots.
    Simmonds M
    Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; 4():24. PubMed ID: 25875027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews.
    Koletsi D; Valla K; Fleming PS; Chaimani A; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():118-24. PubMed ID: 26939926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases in meta-analyses of health research: A review.
    Page MJ; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Egger M
    Res Synth Methods; 2021 Mar; 12(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 33166064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when they are useful and when to be careful.
    Noordzij M; Hooft L; Dekker FW; Zoccali C; Jager KJ
    Kidney Int; 2009 Dec; 76(11):1130-6. PubMed ID: 19727062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis.
    Cheung MW; Vijayakumar R
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2016 Jun; 26(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27209412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Invited review: Recommendations for reporting intervention studies on reproductive performance in dairy cattle: Improving design, analysis, and interpretation of research on reproduction.
    Lean IJ; Lucy MC; McNamara JP; Bradford BJ; Block E; Thomson JM; Morton JM; Celi P; Rabiee AR; Santos JE; Thatcher WW; LeBlanc SJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 26387020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Graphical displays for meta-analysis: An overview with suggestions for practice.
    Anzures-Cabrera J; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2010 Jan; 1(1):66-80. PubMed ID: 26056093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: is the L'Abbé plot useful?
    Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Aug; 52(8):725-30. PubMed ID: 10465316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Exploration of heterogeneity in distributed research network drug safety analyses.
    Hansen RA; Zeng P; Ryan P; Gao J; Sonawane K; Teeter B; Westrich K; Dubois RW
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Dec; 5(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 26052957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of funnel plot asymmetry and publication bias in reproductive health meta-analyses: an analytic survey.
    Souza JP; Pileggi C; Cecatti JG
    Reprod Health; 2007 Apr; 4():3. PubMed ID: 17437636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.
    Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
    Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Choice of effect measure for meta-analyses of dichotomous outcomes influenced the identified heterogeneity and direction of small-study effects.
    Papageorgiou SN; Tsiranidou E; Antonoglou GN; Deschner J; Jäger A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 25666885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.