298 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19622153)
1. Protocol for the value of urodynamics prior to stress incontinence surgery (VUSIS) study: a multicenter randomized controlled trial to assess the cost effectiveness of urodynamics in women with symptoms of stress urinary incontinence in whom surgical treatment is considered.
van Leijsen SA; Kluivers KB; Mol BW; Broekhuis SR; Milani FL; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JP; Bongers MY; den Boon J; Spaans WA; de Leeuw JW; Dietz V; Kleinjan JH; Brölmann HA; Roos EJ; Schaafstra J; Heesakkers JP; Vierhout ME
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Jul; 9():22. PubMed ID: 19622153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): a mixed-methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Hilton P; Armstrong N; Brennand C; Howel D; Shen J; Bryant A; Tincello DG; Lucas MG; Buckley BS; Chapple CR; Homer T; Vale L; McColl E;
Health Technol Assess; 2015 Feb; 19(15):1-273, vii-viii. PubMed ID: 25714493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Value of urodynamics before stress urinary incontinence surgery: a randomized controlled trial.
van Leijsen SAL; Kluivers KB; Mol BWJ; Hout J'; Milani AL; Roovers JWR; Boon JD; Vaart CHV; Langen PH; Hartog FE; Dietz V; Tiersma ESM; Hovius MC; Bongers MY; Spaans W; Heesakkers JPFA; Vierhout ME;
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):999-1008. PubMed ID: 23635736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a randomised controlled trial of invasive urodynamic testing versus clinical assessment and non-invasive tests prior to surgery for stress urinary incontinence in women: the INVESTIGATE-I study.
Hilton P; Armstrong N; Brennand C; Howel D; Shen J; Bryant A; Tincello DG; Lucas MG; Buckley BS; Chapple CR; Homer T; Vale L; McColl E;
Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():400. PubMed ID: 26350343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can preoperative urodynamic investigation be omitted in women with stress urinary incontinence? A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
van Leijsen SA; Kluivers KB; Mol BW; Broekhuis SR; Milani AL; Bongers MY; Aalders CI; Dietz V; Malmberg GG; Vierhout ME; Heesakkers JP
Neurourol Urodyn; 2012 Sep; 31(7):1118-23. PubMed ID: 22488817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical and demographic factors associated with valsalva leak point pressure among women undergoing burch bladder neck suspension or autologous rectus fascial sling procedures.
Lemack GE; Xu Y; Brubaker L; Nager C; Chai T; Moalli P; Kraus SR; Kerr L; Sirls L; Stoddard A;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2007; 26(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 17304525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Male synthetic sling versus artificial urinary sphincter trial for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery (MASTER): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
Constable L; Cotterill N; Cooper D; Glazener C; Drake MJ; Forrest M; Harding C; Kilonzo M; MacLennan G; McCormack K; McDonald A; Mundy A; Norrie J; Pickard R; Ramsay C; Smith R; Wileman S; Abrams P;
Trials; 2018 Feb; 19(1):131. PubMed ID: 29467024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative clinical, demographic, and urodynamic measures associated with failure to demonstrate urodynamic stress incontinence in women enrolled in two randomized clinical trials of surgery for stress urinary incontinence.
Lemack GE; Litman HJ; Nager C; Brubaker L; Lowder J; Norton P; Sirls L; Lloyd K; Kusek JW;
Int Urogynecol J; 2013 Feb; 24(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 22669421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The cost of preoperative urodynamics: A secondary analysis of the ValUE trial.
Norton PA; Nager CW; Brubaker L; Lemack GE; Sirls LT; Holley R; Chai TC; Kraus SR; Zyczynski H; Smith B; Stoddard A;
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Jan; 35(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 25327775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protocol for Physiotherapy Or TVT Randomised Efficacy Trial (PORTRET): a multicentre randomised controlled trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of the tension free vaginal tape versus pelvic floor muscle training in women with symptomatic moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence.
Labrie J; van der Graaf Y; Buskens E; Tiersma SE; van der Vaart HC
BMC Womens Health; 2009 Sep; 9():24. PubMed ID: 19723313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Protocol for the CUPIDO trials; multicenter randomized controlled trials to assess the value of combining prolapse surgery and incontinence surgery in patients with genital prolapse and evident stress incontinence (CUPIDO I) and in patients with genital prolapse and occult stress incontinence (CUPIDO II).
van der Steen A; van der Ploeg M; Dijkgraaf MG; van der Vaart H; Roovers JP
BMC Womens Health; 2010 May; 10():16. PubMed ID: 20459818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urodynamics useless before surgery for female stress urinary incontinence: Are you sure? Results from a multicenter single nation database.
Serati M; Topazio L; Bogani G; Costantini E; Pietropaolo A; Palleschi G; Carbone A; Soligo M; Del Popolo G; Li Marzi V; Salvatore S; Finazzi Agrò E
Neurourol Urodyn; 2016 Sep; 35(7):809-12. PubMed ID: 26061435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tension-free Vaginal Tape-Obturator for Treatment of Pure Urodynamic Stress Urinary Incontinence: Efficacy and Adverse Effects at 10-year Follow-up.
Serati M; Braga A; Athanasiou S; Tommaselli GA; Caccia G; Torella M; Ghezzi F; Salvatore S
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):674-679. PubMed ID: 27597239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The predictive value of demonstrable stress incontinence during basic office evaluation and urodynamics in women without symptomatic urinary incontinence undergoing vaginal prolapse surgery.
van der Ploeg JM; Zwolsman SE; Posthuma S; Wiarda HS; van der Vaart CH; Roovers JWR
Neurourol Urodyn; 2018 Mar; 37(3):1011-1018. PubMed ID: 28834564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape compared with transobturator tape in women with stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency.
Schierlitz L; Dwyer PL; Rosamilia A; Murray C; Thomas E; De Souza A; Hiscock R
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 119(2 Pt 1):321-7. PubMed ID: 22270284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Urodynamic evaluation: can it prevent the need for surgical intervention in women with apparent pure stress urinary incontinence?
Serati M; Cattoni E; Siesto G; Braga A; Sorice P; Cantaluppi S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F; Vitobello D; Bolis P; Salvatore S
BJU Int; 2013 Aug; 112(4):E344-50. PubMed ID: 23421421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.
Ford AA; Rogerson L; Cody JD; Ogah J
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jul; (7):CD006375. PubMed ID: 26130017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. De-implementation of urodynamics in The Netherlands after the VALUE/VUSIS-2 results: a nationwide survey.
Mengerink BB; Nelen WLDM; van Leijsen SAL; Heesakkers JPFA; Kluivers KB
Int Urogynecol J; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1261-1277. PubMed ID: 29679158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) be used to predict outcome of surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence?
Harris N; Swithinbank L; Hayek SA; Yang Q; Abrams P
Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Nov; 30(8):1609-12. PubMed ID: 21780164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
