BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19622516)

  • 21. Sex differences of patients with acute chest pain evaluated through a chest pain unit.
    Arzuan M; Iram YA; Matetzky S; Herscovici R; Goldkorn R; Goitein O; Narodetsky M; Mazin I; Beigel R; Fardman A
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2023 May; 24(5):283-288. PubMed ID: 36957985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.
    Gibbons RJ
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):378. PubMed ID: 35939589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.
    Danzi GB; Piccolo R
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):378. PubMed ID: 35939588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Impact of Family History of Premature Coronary Artery Disease on Noninvasive Testing in Stable Chest Pain.
    Raygor V; Ayers C; Segar MW; Agusala K; Khera A; Pandey A; Joshi PH
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2023 May; 12(10):e029266. PubMed ID: 37158070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term Risks Are Similar for CTA and Invasive Coronary Angiography as Initial Diagnostic Strategy for Stable Chest Pain.
    Kulkarni NS
    Am Fam Physician; 2022 Dec; 106(6):720. PubMed ID: 36521479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.
    Baumann AA; Roberts-Thomson RL; Psaltis PJ
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):377-378. PubMed ID: 35939587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain.
    Redberg R; Jeon D
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):376-377. PubMed ID: 35939586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. CT or Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain. Reply.
    Dodd JD; Kofoed KF; Dewey M;
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Jul; 387(4):379-380. PubMed ID: 35939590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The chest pain guidelines revisited: cherry picking from the frequentist tree.
    Christian TF
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2023 Feb; 30(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 36258156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Coronary Artery Calcium and Chest Pain: Perfect Is the Enemy of Good.
    Hecht HS
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Oct; 15(10):1758-1759. PubMed ID: 36202454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. In intermediate-risk stable chest pain, treatment guided by initial CT vs. ICA did not differ for MACE at 3.5 y.
    Kirschner JM; Hunter BR
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jul; 175(7):JC76. PubMed ID: 35785536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Trust us! Time to move on from pretest probability scores for stable chest pain.
    Villines TC; Weber LA
    Heart; 2022 May; 108(11):822-823. PubMed ID: 35264419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Could a non-radiological chest shape assessment reduce false positive exercise stress echocardiography results?].
    Sonaglioni A; Nicolosi GL; Lombardo M
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2023 Jan; 24(1):75-76. PubMed ID: 36573514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The DISCHARGE trial: imaging a new strategy for the clinical management of stable chest pain?
    Vergallo R; Volpe M
    Eur Heart J; 2022 Jun; 43(21):2008-2009. PubMed ID: 35417531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Absolute risk assessment for guiding cardiovascular risk management in a chest pain clinic.
    Blazak PL; Greaves K
    Med J Aust; 2021 Nov; 215(10):486. PubMed ID: 34689331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Absolute risk assessment for guiding cardiovascular risk management in a chest pain clinic.
    Black JA; Sharman JE; Marwick TH
    Med J Aust; 2021 Nov; 215(10):486. PubMed ID: 34688223
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The diagnostic accuracy and outcomes after coronary computed tomography angiography vs. conventional functional testing in patients with stable angina pectoris: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Nielsen LH; Ortner N; Nørgaard BL; Achenbach S; Leipsic J; Abdulla J
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Sep; 15(9):961-71. PubMed ID: 24618659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. CT coronary angiography and exercise ECG in a population with chest pain and low-to-intermediate pre-test likelihood of coronary artery disease.
    Maffei E; Seitun S; Martini C; Palumbo A; Tarantini G; Berti E; Grilli R; Tedeschi C; Messalli G; Guaricci A; Weustink AC; Mollet NR; Cademartiri F
    Heart; 2010 Dec; 96(24):1973-9. PubMed ID: 21051457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of usefulness of exercise testing versus coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of patients suspected of having coronary artery disease.
    Ovrehus KA; Jensen JK; Mickley HF; Munkholm H; Bøttcher M; Bøtker HE; Nørgaard BL
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Mar; 105(6):773-9. PubMed ID: 20211318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. External validation of novel clinical likelihood models to predict obstructive coronary artery disease and prognosis.
    Rasmussen LD; Williams MC; Newby DE; Dahl JN; Schmidt SE; Bøttcher M; Winther S
    Open Heart; 2023 Dec; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38056915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.