These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

8382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19622551)

  • 21. Exploring reporting quality of systematic reviews and Meta-analyses on nursing interventions in patients with Alzheimer's disease before and after PRISMA introduction.
    Sun X; Zhou X; Yu Y; Liu H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Nov; 18(1):154. PubMed ID: 30497417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perception of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement of authors publishing reviews in nursing journals: a cross-sectional online survey.
    Tam WWS; Tang A; Woo B; Goh SYS
    BMJ Open; 2019 Apr; 9(4):e026271. PubMed ID: 31005930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Panic N; Leoncini E; de Belvis G; Ricciardi W; Boccia S
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e83138. PubMed ID: 24386151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example.
    Simons M; Busch K; Avolio A; Kiat H; Davidson A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46():165-166. PubMed ID: 28974392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Swartz MK
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2011; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21147401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
    Moher D; Shamseer L; Clarke M; Ghersi D; Liberati A; Petticrew M; Shekelle P; Stewart LA;
    Syst Rev; 2015 Jan; 4(1):1. PubMed ID: 25554246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. JHS guidelines on systematic review and meta-analysis submissions.
    Chung KC
    J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 37(6):1121-4. PubMed ID: 22624781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Epidemiology, methodological quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on coronavirus disease 2019: A cross-sectional study.
    Chen Y; Li L; Zhang Q; Liu H; Huang Y; Lin S; Yin G; Xie Q
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2021 Nov; 100(47):e27950. PubMed ID: 34964777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting.
    McInnes M; Tunis AS
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):303-4. PubMed ID: 24956054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Systematic Reviews in Sports Medicine.
    DiSilvestro KJ; Tjoumakaris FP; Maltenfort MG; Spindler KP; Freedman KB
    Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):533-8. PubMed ID: 25899433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.
    Ruano J; Gómez-García F; Gay-Mimbrera J; Aguilar-Luque M; Fernández-Rueda JL; Fernández-Chaichio J; Alcalde-Mellado P; Carmona-Fernandez PJ; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Viguera-Guerra I; Franco-García F; Cárdenas-Aranzana M; Romero JLH; Gonzalez-Padilla M; Isla-Tejera B; Garcia-Nieto AV
    Syst Rev; 2018 Mar; 7(1):43. PubMed ID: 29523200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Meta-analyses (QUOROM)].
    Urrutia G; Tort S; Bonfill X;
    Med Clin (Barc); 2005 Dec; 125 Suppl 1():32-7. PubMed ID: 16464425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
    Page MJ; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reporting guidelines: CONSORT, PRISMA, and SQUIRE.
    Foster RL
    J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2012 Jan; 17(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 22188266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of published studies: an overview and best practices.
    Mandrekar JN; Mandrekar SJ
    J Thorac Oncol; 2011 Aug; 6(8):1301-3. PubMed ID: 21847059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of individual participant data: the PRISMA-IPD Statement.
    Stewart LA; Clarke M; Rovers M; Riley RD; Simmonds M; Stewart G; Tierney JF;
    JAMA; 2015 Apr; 313(16):1657-65. PubMed ID: 25919529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Blinded by PRISMA: are systematic reviewers focusing on PRISMA and ignoring other guidelines?
    Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Pandis N
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e96407. PubMed ID: 24788774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Longitudinal analysis of reporting and quality of systematic reviews in high-impact surgical journals.
    Chapman SJ; Drake TM; Bolton WS; Barnard J; Bhangu A
    Br J Surg; 2017 Feb; 104(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 28001294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 420.