78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19622723)
21. Qualitative age interactions (or effect modification) suggest different cancer pathways for early-onset and late-onset breast cancers.
Anderson WF; Chen BE; Brinton LA; Devesa SS
Cancer Causes Control; 2007 Dec; 18(10):1187-98. PubMed ID: 17823850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Lymphatic vascular invasion in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential with stromal microinvasion: a case control study.
Sangoi AR; McKenney JK; Dadras SS; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Feb; 32(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 18223329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Testing of two binary grading systems for FIGO stage III serous carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum.
Seidman JD; Horkayne-Szakaly I; Cosin JA; Ryu HS; Haiba M; Boice CR; Yemelyanova AV
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Nov; 103(2):703-8. PubMed ID: 16828848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinically occult tubal and ovarian high-grade serous carcinomas presenting in uterine samples: diagnostic pitfalls and clues to improve recognition of tumor origin.
Bagby C; Ronnett BM; Yemelyanova A; Maleki Z; Kuhn E; Vang R
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2013 Sep; 32(5):433-43. PubMed ID: 23896706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microinvasion links ovarian serous borderline tumor and grade 1 invasive carcinoma.
Hogg R; Scurry J; Kim SN; Friedlander M; Hacker N
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jul; 106(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17467045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fallopian tube precursors of ovarian low- and high-grade serous neoplasms.
Vang R; Shih IeM; Kurman RJ
Histopathology; 2013 Jan; 62(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 23240669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Prognostic factors for high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Chan JK; Tian C; Monk BJ; Herzog T; Kapp DS; Bell J; Young RC;
Cancer; 2008 May; 112(10):2202-10. PubMed ID: 18348296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Patterns of stromal invasion in ovarian serous tumors of low malignant potential (borderline tumors): a reevaluation of the concept of stromal microinvasion.
McKenney JK; Balzer BL; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Oct; 30(10):1209-21. PubMed ID: 17001150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Subdividing ovarian and peritoneal serous carcinoma into moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated does not have biologic validity based on molecular genetic and in vitro drug resistance data.
Vang R; Shih IeM; Salani R; Sugar E; Ayhan A; Kurman RJ
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Nov; 32(11):1667-74. PubMed ID: 18769340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ovarian cancer incidence in the United States, 1992-1999.
Quirk JT; Natarajan N
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):519-23. PubMed ID: 15863154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of age-specific incidence rate patterns for different histopathologic types of breast carcinoma.
Anderson WF; Chu KC; Chang S; Sherman ME
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Jul; 13(7):1128-35. PubMed ID: 15247123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transitional cell-like morphology in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma: morphologic, immunohistochemical, and behavioral features distinguishing it from high-grade serous carcinoma.
Karnezis AN; Aysal A; Zaloudek CJ; Rabban JT
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Jan; 37(1):24-37. PubMed ID: 23108017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1/epidermal growth factor receptor coexpression is characteristic of a highly aggressive, poor-prognosis subgroup of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.
Liebscher CA; Prinzler J; Sinn BV; Budczies J; Denkert C; Noske A; Sehouli J; Braicu EI; Dietel M; Darb-Esfahani S
Hum Pathol; 2013 Aug; 44(8):1465-71. PubMed ID: 23465277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. My approach to and thoughts on the typing of ovarian carcinomas.
McCluggage WG
J Clin Pathol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):152-63. PubMed ID: 17704261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Microsatellite instability and mismatch repair protein defects in ovarian epithelial neoplasms in patients 50 years of age and younger.
Jensen KC; Mariappan MR; Putcha GV; Husain A; Chun N; Ford JM; Schrijver I; Longacre TA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Jul; 32(7):1029-37. PubMed ID: 18469706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the clinical behavior of newly diagnosed stages II-IV low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary with that of serous ovarian tumors of low malignant potential that recur as low-grade serous carcinoma.
Shvartsman HS; Sun CC; Bodurka DC; Mahajan V; Crispens M; Lu KH; Deavers MT; Malpica A; Silva EG; Gershenson DM
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 17320156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Ovarian clear cell carcinomas: RHO GTPases may contribute to explain their singular biologic behavior.
Canet B; Pons C; Espinosa I; Prat J
Hum Pathol; 2011 Jun; 42(6):833-9. PubMed ID: 21208644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trends of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the United States.
Matsuo K; Machida H; Grubbs BH; Sood AK; Gershenson DM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e15. PubMed ID: 29185273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Nuclear size distinguishes low- from high-grade ovarian serous carcinoma and predicts outcome.
Hsu CY; Kurman RJ; Vang R; Wang TL; Baak J; Shih IeM
Hum Pathol; 2005 Oct; 36(10):1049-54. PubMed ID: 16226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ovarian cancer. Age contrasts in incidence, histology, disease stage at diagnosis, and mortality.
Yancik R
Cancer; 1993 Jan; 71(2 Suppl):517-23. PubMed ID: 8420671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
