BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

650 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19622848)

  • 1. Uncertainty reduction in intensity modulated proton therapy by inverse Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Morávek Z; Rickhey M; Hartmann M; Bogner L
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4803-19. PubMed ID: 19622848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the optimization starting conditions on the robustness of intensity-modulated proton therapy plans.
    Albertini F; Hug EB; Lomax AJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 May; 55(10):2863-78. PubMed ID: 20427853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beams.
    Luo W; Li J; Fourkal E; Fan J; Xu X; Chen Z; Jin L; Price R; Ma CM
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7151-66. PubMed ID: 19033641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
    Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of dose engine accuracy on the optimum dose distribution in intensity-modulated proton therapy treatment plans.
    Soukup M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(3):725-40. PubMed ID: 17228117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust algorithm of intensity modulated proton therapy for critical tissue sparing and target coverage.
    Inaniwa T; Kanematsu N; Furukawa T; Hasegawa A
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(15):4749-70. PubMed ID: 21753233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Pflugfelder D; Wilkens JJ; Oelfke U
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Mar; 53(6):1689-700. PubMed ID: 18367797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo dose calculations for spot scanned proton therapy.
    Tourovsky A; Lomax AJ; Schneider U; Pedroni E
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):971-81. PubMed ID: 15798269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of uncertainty-based stopping criteria for monte carlo calculations of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and arc therapy patient dose distributions.
    Vanderstraeten B; Olteanu AM; Reynaert N; Leal A; De Neve W; Thierens H
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Oct; 69(2):628-37. PubMed ID: 17869677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accounting for range uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Unkelbach J; Chan TC; Bortfeld T
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(10):2755-73. PubMed ID: 17473350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 4D Monte Carlo simulation of proton beam scanning: modelling of variations in time and space to study the interplay between scanning pattern and time-dependent patient geometry.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Trofimov A
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):983-90. PubMed ID: 15798270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intensity modulation under geometrical uncertainty: a deconvolution approach to robust fluence.
    Fan Y; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 55(14):4029-45. PubMed ID: 20601776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A dose optimization method for electron radiotherapy using randomized aperture beams.
    Engel K; Gauer T
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(17):5253-70. PubMed ID: 19671972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using mixed integer programming.
    Yang R; Dai J; Yang Y; Hu Y
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(15):3653-66. PubMed ID: 16861772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy.
    Ma Y; Popple R; Suh TS; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1587-95. PubMed ID: 19733446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A particle swarm optimization algorithm for beam angle selection in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning.
    Li Y; Yao D; Yao J; Chen W
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(15):3491-514. PubMed ID: 16030379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An efficient dose calculation strategy for intensity modulated proton therapy.
    Li Y; Zhang X; Mohan R
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):N71-84. PubMed ID: 21263173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shortening delivery times of intensity modulated proton therapy by reducing proton energy layers during treatment plan optimization.
    van de Water S; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Jun; 92(2):460-8. PubMed ID: 25823447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dosimetric verification for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of thoracic cancers using experimental and Monte Carlo approaches.
    Jang SY; Liu HH; Wang X; Vassiliev ON; Siebers JV; Dong L; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Nov; 66(3):939-48. PubMed ID: 17011466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.