These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1962313)

  • 1. A critical comparison of three methods for measuring dental models.
    Rossouw PE; Benatar M; Stander I; Wynchank S
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Apr; 46(4):223-6. PubMed ID: 1962313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
    Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The comparison analysis of the line measurements between plaster and virtual orthodontic 3D models].
    Jedlińska A
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2008; 54(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 19374240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of a software program for applying the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system to digital casts.
    Hildebrand JC; Palomo JM; Palomo L; Sivik M; Hans M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):283-9. PubMed ID: 18249296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The holodent system, a new technique for measurement and storage of dental casts.
    Mårtensson B; Rydén H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Aug; 102(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 1636627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of adding a stone base on the accuracy of working casts using different types of dental stone.
    Al-Abidi K; Ellakwa A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Sep; 7(4):17-28. PubMed ID: 16957787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
    Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
    J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.
    Okunami TR; Kusnoto B; BeGole E; Evans CA; Sadowsky C; Fadavi S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jan; 131(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 17208106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fit of implant-supported fixed prostheses fabricated on master casts made from a dental stone and a dental plaster.
    Wise M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Nov; 86(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 11725282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of space analysis with emodels and plaster models.
    Mullen SR; Martin CA; Ngan P; Gladwin M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):346-52. PubMed ID: 17826603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
    Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Holograms as substitutes for orthodontic study casts: a pilot clinical trial.
    Harradine N; Suominen R; Stephens C; Hathorn I; Brown I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 2378316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional imaging of orthodontic models: a pilot study.
    Asquith J; Gillgrass T; Mossey P
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17974542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A system for the simulation and planning of orthodontic treatment using a low cost 3D laser scanner for dental anatomy capturing.
    Alcañiz M; Grau V; Monserrat C; Juan C; Albalat S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():8-14. PubMed ID: 10538404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital model analysis for the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system for dental casts.
    Costalos PA; Sarraf K; Cangialosi TJ; Efstratiadis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):624-9. PubMed ID: 16286210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity.
    Walker MP; Ries D; Borello B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):669-74. PubMed ID: 18807563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models: comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements.
    Stevens DR; Flores-Mir C; Nebbe B; Raboud DW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):794-803. PubMed ID: 16769498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.