These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19623882)

  • 1. BI-RADS: what do we need to know? Advantages and limitations.
    Kanso H; Hourani R; Aoun N; Ghossain M
    J Med Liban; 2009; 57(2):75-82. PubMed ID: 19623882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. False-negative rate of combined mammography and ultrasound for women with palpable breast masses.
    Chan CH; Coopey SB; Freer PE; Hughes KS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):699-702. PubMed ID: 26341750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Use of BI-RADS to interpret magnetic resonance mammography for breast cancer].
    Kharuzhyk SA; Shimanets SV; Karman AV; Shapoval EV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):46-59. PubMed ID: 25775888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value?
    Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. BI-RADS
    Spak DA; Plaxco JS; Santiago L; Dryden MJ; Dogan BE
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 Mar; 98(3):179-190. PubMed ID: 28131457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Current Status and Future of BI-RADS in Multimodality Imaging, From the
    Eghtedari M; Chong A; Rakow-Penner R; Ojeda-Fournier H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Apr; 216(4):860-873. PubMed ID: 33295802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Neddle-guided biopsy in the diagnosis of non-palpable breast cancer].
    Becerra-Alcántara GI; Círigo-Villagómez LL; Ramos-Medina F; Robledo-Martínez H; Mar-Merinos CG; Panzi-Altamirano RM
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2015 Jul; 83(7):400-7. PubMed ID: 26422910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardized diagnosis and reporting of breast cancer.
    Thomassin-Naggara I; Tardivon A; Chopier J
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014; 95(7-8):759-66. PubMed ID: 25017150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated extraction of BI-RADS final assessment categories from radiology reports with natural language processing.
    Sippo DA; Warden GI; Andriole KP; Lacson R; Ikuta I; Birdwell RL; Khorasani R
    J Digit Imaging; 2013 Oct; 26(5):989-94. PubMed ID: 23868515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Revised practice guideline 'Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer'].
    Zonderland HM; Tuut MK; den Heeten GJ; Asperen CJ; de Bock GH; Rutqers EJ; Westenend PJ; Smit GM; Benraadt J
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Oct; 152(43):2336-9. PubMed ID: 19024064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Second reading of breast imaging at the hospital department of radiology: reasonable or waste of money?].
    Teifke A; Vomweg TW; Hlawatsch A; Nasresfahani A; Kern A; Victor A; Schmidt M; Bittinger F; Düber C
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):330-6. PubMed ID: 16508842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
    Rao AA; Feneis J; Lalonde C; Ojeda-Fournier H
    Radiographics; 2016; 36(3):623-39. PubMed ID: 27082663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Palpable masses in breast during lactation.
    Obenauer S; Dammert S
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17189838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How should screening breast US be audited? The BI-RADS perspective.
    Sickles EA; D'Orsi CJ
    Radiology; 2014 Aug; 272(2):316-20. PubMed ID: 25058131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The challenge of imaging dense breast parenchyma: is magnetic resonance mammography the technique of choice? A comparative study with x-ray mammography and whole-breast ultrasound.
    Pediconi F; Catalano C; Roselli A; Dominelli V; Cagioli S; Karatasiou A; Pronio A; Kirchin MA; Passariello R
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):412-21. PubMed ID: 19448554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BI-RADS decoded: detailed guidance on potentially confusing issues.
    D'Orsi CJ; Newell MS
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):751-63, v. PubMed ID: 17888766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal measurement of clinical mammographic breast density to improve estimation of breast cancer risk.
    Kerlikowske K; Ichikawa L; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Vacek PM; Smith-Bindman R; Yankaskas B; Carney PA; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):386-95. PubMed ID: 17341730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Presentation of the French translation of the Breast Imaging Reporting System and Data System (BI-RADS)].
    Lévy L; Suissa M; Bokobsa J; Tristant H; Chiche JF; Martin B; Teman G
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2005 May; 33(5):338-47. PubMed ID: 15922646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.