BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625227)

  • 21. The end game - A quantitative assessment tool for anastomosis in simulated microsurgery.
    Kim E; Norman ICF; Myers S; Singh M; Ghanem A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jun; 73(6):1116-1121. PubMed ID: 32197885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reconstructive Microsurgery: From a Set of Skills to a Stand-Alone Specialty of Elite Surgeons.
    Deek NFA
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Feb; 35(2):e3. PubMed ID: 29705981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. High-stakes assessment of the non-technical skills of critical care trainees using simulation: feasibility, acceptability and reliability.
    Nunnink L; Foot C; Venkatesh B; Corke C; Saxena M; Lucey M; Jones M
    Crit Care Resusc; 2014 Mar; 16(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 24588430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of a microsurgery training program using a chicken wing model.
    Dave A; Singhal M; Tiwari R; Chauhan S; De M
    J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2022 Aug; 56(4):191-197. PubMed ID: 34339351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Stanford Microsurgery and Resident Training (SMaRT) Scale: validation of an on-line global rating scale for technical assessment.
    Satterwhite T; Son J; Carey J; Echo A; Spurling T; Paro J; Gurtner G; Chang J; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014 May; 72 Suppl 1():S84-8. PubMed ID: 24691332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Survey of reconstructive microsurgery training in Korea.
    Moon SJ; Hong JP; Kang SR; Suh HS
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2015 Jan; 31(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 25077879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is There Bias against Simulation in Microsurgery Training?
    Theman TA; Labow BI
    J Reconstr Microsurg; 2016 Sep; 32(7):540-5. PubMed ID: 27077211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Microsurgery education in residency training: validating an online curriculum.
    Satterwhite T; Son J; Carey J; Zeidler K; Bari S; Gurtner G; Chang J; Lee GK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Apr; 68(4):410-4. PubMed ID: 22421490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Tool for assessing surgical tracheostomy skills in otolaryngology residents.
    Al-Qahtani KH; Alkhalidi AM; Islam T
    B-ENT; 2015; 11(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 26891539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Nurse training with simulation: an innovative approach to teach complex microsurgery patient care.
    Flurry M; Brooke S; Micholetti B; Natoli N; Moyer K; Mnich S; Potochny J
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):459-61. PubMed ID: 22972552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Mastering microsurgery: A novel benchmarking tool for microsurgical training.
    Kim E; Chawla S; Ghanem A
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Feb; 75(2):811-816. PubMed ID: 34753684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reel it in: A readily available and high-fidelity model for microvascular training.
    Baker BG; Patel N; Jeevan R
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Dec; 72(12):2064-2094. PubMed ID: 31623985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Microsurgery Workout: A Novel Simulation Training Curriculum Based on Nonliving Models.
    Rodriguez JR; YaƱez R; Cifuentes I; Varas J; Dagnino B
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Oct; 138(4):739e-747e. PubMed ID: 27673544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Description and implementation of an ex vivo simulator kit for developing microsurgery skills.
    Soto-Miranda MA; Ver Halen JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2014; 72(6):S208-12. PubMed ID: 24691333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A pilot study to assess the construct and face validity of the Northwestern Objective Microanastomosis Assessment Tool.
    Aoun SG; El Ahmadieh TY; El Tecle NE; Daou MR; Adel JG; Park CS; Batjer HH; Bendok BR
    J Neurosurg; 2015 Jul; 123(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 25658787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Re: Microvascular free flaps are a safe and suitable training procedure during structured plastic surgery residency: A comparative cohort study with 391 patients.
    Pafitanis G; King IC; Ghanem AM; Myers SR
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Oct; 69(10):1455-6. PubMed ID: 27477324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of a new valid and reliable microsurgical skill assessment scale for ophthalmology residents.
    Zhang Z; Zhou M; Liu K; Zhu B; Liu H; Sun X; Xu X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):68. PubMed ID: 29506509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fellowship training in microvascular surgery and post-fellowship practice patterns: a cross sectional survey of microvascular surgeons from facial plastic and reconstructive surgery programs.
    Bennion DM; Dziegielewski PT; Boyce BJ; Ducic Y; Sawhney R
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 May; 48(1):19. PubMed ID: 31072392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Motion Analysis for Microsurgical Training: Objective Measures of Dexterity, Economy of Movement, and Ability.
    McGoldrick RB; Davis CR; Paro J; Hui K; Nguyen D; Lee GK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):231e-240e. PubMed ID: 26218398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Objective assessment of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Development and validation of a feasible rating scale for formative and summative feedback.
    Savran MM; Hoffmann E; Konge L; Ottosen C; Larsen CR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 237():74-78. PubMed ID: 31022656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.