These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625301)

  • 1. Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success.
    Maclellan K; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Biol Lett; 2009 Dec; 5(6):795-7. PubMed ID: 19625301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mating density and the strength of sexual selection against deleterious alleles in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2008 Apr; 62(4):857-67. PubMed ID: 18221380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Arbuthnott D; Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2012 Jul; 66(7):2127-37. PubMed ID: 22759290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Clark SC; Sharp NP; Rowe L; Agrawal AF
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37351. PubMed ID: 22662148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mendel's law reveals fatal flaws in Bateman's 1948 study of mating and fitness.
    Gowaty PA; Kim YK; Anderson WW
    Fly (Austin); 2013; 7(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 23360967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ribó G; Ocaña J; Prevosti A
    Heredity (Edinb); 1989 Oct; 63 ( Pt 2)():195-202. PubMed ID: 2509403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sexual Selection Does Not Increase the Rate of Compensatory Adaptation to a Mutation Influencing a Secondary Sexual Trait in
    Chandler CH; Mammel A; Dworkin I
    G3 (Bethesda); 2020 May; 10(5):1541-1551. PubMed ID: 32122961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inbreeding reveals stronger net selection on Drosophila melanogaster males: implications for mutation load and the fitness of sexual females.
    Mallet MA; Chippindale AK
    Heredity (Edinb); 2011 Jun; 106(6):994-1002. PubMed ID: 21119701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    MacLellan K; Kwan L; Whitlock MC; Rundle HD
    Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Mar; 108(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 21792225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sexual selection accelerates the elimination of a deleterious mutant in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Hollis B; Fierst JL; Houle D
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 19154371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male-biased fitness effects of spontaneous mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Sharp NP; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2013 Apr; 67(4):1189-95. PubMed ID: 23550766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex, mutation and fitness: asymmetric costs and routes to recovery through compensatory evolution.
    Pischedda A; Chippindale A
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):1115-22. PubMed ID: 16033585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors affecting the genetic load in Drosophila: synergistic epistasis and correlations among fitness components.
    Whitlock MC; Bourguet D
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1654-60. PubMed ID: 11108592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of parasites on sex differences in selection.
    Sharp NP; Vincent CM
    Heredity (Edinb); 2015 Apr; 114(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25649503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Populations with elevated mutation load do not benefit from the operation of sexual selection.
    Hollis B; Houle D
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Sep; 24(9):1918-26. PubMed ID: 21658188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex-Specific Variance in Fitness and the Efficacy of Selection.
    Singh A; Agrawal AF
    Am Nat; 2022 May; 199(5):587-602. PubMed ID: 35472021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Association between sex ratio distortion and sexually antagonistic fitness consequences of female choice.
    Connallon T; Jakubowski E
    Evolution; 2009 Aug; 63(8):2179-83. PubMed ID: 19453376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.
    Whitlock MC; Agrawal AF
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):569-82. PubMed ID: 19154364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Males from populations with higher competitive mating success produce sons with lower fitness.
    Nguyen TTX; Moehring AJ
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):528-534. PubMed ID: 30811733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.