400 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625717)
1. Effects of pay for performance on the quality of primary care in England.
Campbell SM; Reeves D; Kontopantelis E; Sibbald B; Roland M
N Engl J Med; 2009 Jul; 361(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 19625717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality of primary care in England with the introduction of pay for performance.
Campbell S; Reeves D; Kontopantelis E; Middleton E; Sibbald B; Roland M
N Engl J Med; 2007 Jul; 357(2):181-90. PubMed ID: 17625132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Family doctor responses to changes in incentives for influenza immunization under the U.K. Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme.
Kontopantelis E; Doran T; Gravelle H; Goudie R; Siciliani L; Sutton M
Health Serv Res; 2012 Jun; 47(3 Pt 1):1117-36. PubMed ID: 22171997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of financial incentives on the quality of health care provided by primary care physicians.
Scott A; Sivey P; Ait Ouakrim D; Willenberg L; Naccarella L; Furler J; Young D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2011 Sep; (9):CD008451. PubMed ID: 21901722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association of practice size and pay-for-performance incentives with the quality of diabetes management in primary care.
Vamos EP; Pape UJ; Bottle A; Hamilton FL; Curcin V; Ng A; Molokhia M; Car J; Majeed A; Millett C
CMAJ; 2011 Sep; 183(12):E809-16. PubMed ID: 21810950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incentive payments are not related to expected health gain in the pay for performance scheme for UK primary care: cross-sectional analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Walker S; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2012 Apr; 12():94. PubMed ID: 22507660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recorded quality of primary care for patients with diabetes in England before and after the introduction of a financial incentive scheme: a longitudinal observational study.
Kontopantelis E; Reeves D; Valderas JM; Campbell S; Doran T
BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Jan; 22(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 22918988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incentive schemes to increase dementia diagnoses in primary care in England: a retrospective cohort study of unintended consequences.
Liu D; Green E; Kasteridis P; Goddard M; Jacobs R; Wittenberg R; Mason A
Br J Gen Pract; 2019 Mar; 69(680):e154-e163. PubMed ID: 30803980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The experience of pay for performance in English family practice: a qualitative study.
Campbell SM; McDonald R; Lester H
Ann Fam Med; 2008; 6(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 18474885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimated impact from the withdrawal of primary care financial incentives on selected indicators of quality of care in Scotland: controlled interrupted time series analysis.
Morales DR; Minchin M; Kontopantelis E; Roland M; Sutton M; Guthrie B
BMJ; 2023 Mar; 380():e072098. PubMed ID: 36948515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Mind the gap!" Evaluation of the performance gap attributable to exception reporting and target thresholds in the new GMS contract: National database analysis.
Fleetcroft R; Steel N; Cookson R; Howe A
BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 Jun; 8():131. PubMed ID: 18559086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.
Doran T; Fullwood C; Gravelle H; Reeves D; Kontopantelis E; Hiroeh U; Roland M
N Engl J Med; 2006 Jul; 355(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 16870916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of financial and reputational incentives on primary care performance: a longitudinal study.
Allen T; Whittaker W; Kontopantelis E; Sutton M
Br J Gen Pract; 2018 Dec; 68(677):e811-e818. PubMed ID: 30397016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Has pay for performance improved the management of diabetes in the United Kingdom?
Alshamsan R; Millett C; Majeed A; Khunti K
Prim Care Diabetes; 2010 Jul; 4(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 20363200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences.
McDonald R; Roland M
Ann Fam Med; 2009; 7(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 19273866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improvements in quality of clinical care in English general practice 1998-2003: longitudinal observational study.
Campbell SM; Roland MO; Middleton E; Reeves D
BMJ; 2005 Nov; 331(7525):1121. PubMed ID: 16257992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of a national primary care pay for performance scheme on emergency hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions: controlled longitudinal study.
Harrison MJ; Dusheiko M; Sutton M; Gravelle H; Doran T; Roland M
BMJ; 2014 Nov; 349():g6423. PubMed ID: 25389120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes in patient experiences of primary care during health service reforms in England between 2003 and 2007.
Campbell SM; Kontopantelis E; Reeves D; Valderas JM; Gaehl E; Small N; Roland MO
Ann Fam Med; 2010; 8(6):499-506. PubMed ID: 21060119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Implementation of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study 8 years after introduction.
Lester H; Matharu T; Mohammed MA; Lester D; Foskett-Tharby R
Br J Gen Pract; 2013 Jun; 63(611):e408-15. PubMed ID: 23735412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increase in the pharmacological management of Type 2 diabetes with pay-for-performance in primary care in the UK.
Gallagher N; Cardwell C; Hughes C; O'Reilly D
Diabet Med; 2015 Jan; 32(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 25185888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
