These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625843)

  • 21. Changes in facial profile of young adults with normal occlusion: a longitudinal study.
    Tibana RH; Palagi LM; Carneiro MS; Almeida MA; Miguel JA
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 18575305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Serrao G
    J Anat; 1995 Feb; 186 ( Pt 1)(Pt 1):103-10. PubMed ID: 7649806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the effects of Twin Block and activator treatment on the soft tissue profile.
    Varlik SK; Gültan A; Tümer N
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 18281262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of soft tissue references for anteroposterior measurement of dental bases.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Serrao G; Colombo A; Ciusa V; Bignotto M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1998; 13(3):210-6. PubMed ID: 9835820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics. Part I. Method and normative data.
    Starck WJ; Epker BN
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1996; 11(2):91-103. PubMed ID: 9046631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Soft tissue facial profile of normal dental and skeletal subjects in Croatian population aged 12 to 15 years.
    Lapter Varga M; Anić Milosević S; Vusić A; Slaj M; Varga S; Perinić M; Slaj M
    Coll Antropol; 2008 Jun; 32(2):523-8. PubMed ID: 18756905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of anthropometry with photogrammetry based on a standardized clinical photographic technique using a cephalostat and chair.
    Han K; Kwon HJ; Choi TH; Kim JH; Son D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 19482483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lateral facial soft-tissue prediction model: analysis using Fourier shape descriptors and traditional cephalometric methods.
    Rose AD; Woods MG; Clement JG; Thomas CD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Jun; 121(2):172-80. PubMed ID: 12740960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Linear photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile.
    Fernández-Riveiro P; Suárez-Quintanilla D; Smyth-Chamosa E; Suárez-Cunqueiro M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Jul; 122(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 12142898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Facial photogrammetric profile measurements and sagittal dental occlusion in the young Congolese Bantu Adult (DRC).
    Esabish PL; Beugre-Kouassi LMA; Baukaka FS; Nzanza RM; Gboro TD; Beugre JB
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):342-353. PubMed ID: 31053446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The use of parental data to evaluate soft tissues in an Anatolian Turkish population according to Holdaway soft tissue norms.
    Gelgör IE; Karaman AI; Zekiç E
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):330.e1-9. PubMed ID: 16527625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Harmonic analysis of facial profiles: a 10-year evaluation.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Dellavia C; Schmitz JH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2001; 16(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 11563397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of soft and hard tissue profiles of orthognathic surgery patients treated recently and 20 years earlier.
    Papadopoulos MA; Lazaridou-Terzoudi T; Øland J; Athanasiou AE; Melsen B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jul; 108(1):e8-13. PubMed ID: 19540447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional face shape analysis of French adults, and its application to the design of protective equipment.
    Coblentz A; Mollard R; Ignazi G
    Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):497-517. PubMed ID: 1860465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Croatians using of linear measurements.
    Milosević SA; Varga ML; Slaj M
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):251-8. PubMed ID: 18216697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. 3D stereophotogrammetry quantitative lip analysis.
    Sawyer AR; See M; Nduka C
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2009 Jul; 33(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 18584237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Vertical photogrammetric evaluation of the soft tissue profiles of two different racial groups: a comparative study.
    Diouf JS; Ngom PI; Fadiga MS; Badiane A; Diop-Ba K; Ndiaye M; Diagne F
    Int Orthod; 2014 Dec; 12(4):443-57. PubMed ID: 25457394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Photogrammetric analysis of soft tissue facial profile in Turkish rhinoplasty population.
    Gode S; Tiris FS; Akyildiz S; Apaydin F
    Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Dec; 35(6):1016-21. PubMed ID: 21487908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Human dental arch shape evaluated by euclidean-distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; Miani A; Tartaglia G
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):445-53. PubMed ID: 8476003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft-tissue facial profile of Indian adults.
    Pandian KS; Krishnan S; Kumar SA
    Indian J Dent Res; 2018; 29(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 29652003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.