BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625902)

  • 1. Inaccuracy of the administrative database: comparative analysis of two databases for the diagnosis and treatment of intracranial aneurysms.
    Woodworth GF; Baird CJ; Garces-Ambrossi G; Tonascia J; Tamargo RJ
    Neurosurgery; 2009 Aug; 65(2):251-6; discussion 256-7. PubMed ID: 19625902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Administrative data accurately identified intensive care unit admissions in Ontario.
    Scales DC; Guan J; Martin CM; Redelmeier DA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 59(8):802-7. PubMed ID: 16828673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coding accuracy of hospital discharge data for elderly survivors of myocardial infarction.
    Levy AR; Tamblyn RM; Fitchett D; McLeod PJ; Hanley JA
    Can J Cardiol; 1999 Nov; 15(11):1277-82. PubMed ID: 10579743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The accuracy of administrative data diagnoses of systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
    Bernatsky S; Linehan T; Hanly JG
    J Rheumatol; 2011 Aug; 38(8):1612-6. PubMed ID: 21532057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Discordance between self-report of physician diagnosis and administrative database diagnosis of arthritis and its predictors.
    Singh JA
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Sep; 36(9):2000-8. PubMed ID: 19684149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health data quality improvement by comparing administrative medical data and billing data.
    Ceratti A; Roger France FH; Beguin C
    Int J Med Inform; 2008 Aug; 77(8):527-33. PubMed ID: 18035589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison between administrative and clinical databases in the evaluation of cardiac surgery performance].
    Rosato S; D'Errigo P; Badoni G; Fusco D; Perucci CA; Seccareccia F
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2008 Aug; 9(8):569-78. PubMed ID: 18780554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing accuracy of diagnosis-type indicators for flagging complications in administrative data.
    Quan H; Parsons GA; Ghali WA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Apr; 57(4):366-72. PubMed ID: 15135837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The impact of unmeasured clinical variables on the accuracy of hospital report cards: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC
    Med Decis Making; 2006; 26(5):447-66. PubMed ID: 16997924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database.
    Preen DB; Holman CD; Lawrence DM; Baynham NJ; Semmens JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1295-304. PubMed ID: 15617956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a centrally maintained computerized hospital database: comparison with operating room logbooks.
    Pilpel D; Fraser GM; Kosecoff J; Brook RH
    Isr J Med Sci; 1993 May; 29(5):287-91. PubMed ID: 8314689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Commentary on "a roadmap for the prevention of dementia II: Leon Thal Symposium 2008." Establishing a national biomarker database: utility and incentives.
    Cummings JL
    Alzheimers Dement; 2009 Mar; 5(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 19328437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing indicators of inpatient adverse drug events through nonlinear analysis using administrative data.
    Nebeker JR; Yarnold PR; Soltysik RC; Sauer BC; Sims SA; Samore MH; Rupper RW; Swanson KM; Savitz LA; Shinogle J; Xu W
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S81-8. PubMed ID: 17909388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Health services research in critical care using administrative data.
    Wunsch H; Harrison DA; Rowan K
    J Crit Care; 2005 Sep; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 16253796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy and yield of ICD-9 codes for identifying children with ischemic stroke.
    Labovitz DL
    Neurology; 2007 May; 68(19):1638; author reply 1638. PubMed ID: 17485659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of prevalence estimates derived from misclassified data from administrative databases.
    Ladouceur M; Rahme E; Pineau CA; Joseph L
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17447953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--a comparison of administrative and clinical data.
    Welke KF; Karamlou T; Diggs BS
    Cardiol Young; 2008 Dec; 18 Suppl 2():137-44. PubMed ID: 19063784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integration of databases for radiotherapy outcomes analyses.
    Jani AB; Davis LW; Fox TH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2007 Nov; 4(11):825-31. PubMed ID: 17964505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validating diagnostic information on the Minimum Data Set in Ontario Hospital-based long-term care.
    Wodchis WP; Naglie G; Teare GF
    Med Care; 2008 Aug; 46(8):882-7. PubMed ID: 18665069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgical outcomes research: a progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - how far have we come?
    Morrato EH; Dillon P; Ziegler M
    Curr Opin Pediatr; 2008 Jun; 20(3):320-5. PubMed ID: 18475103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.