219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19625902)
21. Determine the therapeutic role of radiotherapy in administrative data: a data mining approach.
Zhang-Salomons J; Salomons G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Feb; 15():11. PubMed ID: 25649372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Documentation of competency: Maintaining an outcomes database.
Ricci MA; Beardall RW
Semin Vasc Surg; 2002 Sep; 15(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 12228868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Methods to analyze real-world databases and registries.
Kremers HM
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 19583553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Advantages and limitations of using national administrative data on obstetric blood transfusions to estimate the frequency of obstetric hemorrhages.
Quantin C; Benzenine E; Ferdynus C; Sediki M; Auverlot B; Abrahamowicz M; Morel P; Gouyon JB; Sagot P
J Public Health (Oxf); 2013 Mar; 35(1):147-56. PubMed ID: 22829662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A validation of the diagnosis of obstetric sphincter tears in two Norwegian databases, the Medical Birth Registry and the Patient Administration System.
Baghestan E; Børdahl PE; Rasmussen SA; Sande AK; Lyslo I; Solvang I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 17364284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Using secondary data sources for pharmacoepidemiology and outcomes research.
Harpe SE
Pharmacotherapy; 2009 Feb; 29(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 19170584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Intracranial aneurysms difficult to be treated by endovascular interventional therapy: report of 27 patients].
Wang H; Li HY; Zhao YL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 89(5):331-4. PubMed ID: 19563712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Generic obstetric database systems are unreliable for reporting the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
Thornton C; Makris A; Ogle R; Hennessy A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 15598285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Administrative database research has unique characteristics that can risk biased results.
van Walraven C; Austin P
J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):126-31. PubMed ID: 22075111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The European Prader-Willi Syndrome Clinical Research Database: an aid in the investigation of a rare genetically determined neurodevelopmental disorder.
Holland A; Whittington J; Cohen O; Curfs L; Delahaye F; Dudley O; Horsthemke B; Lindgren AC; Nourissier C; Sharma N; Vogels A
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2009 Jun; 53(6):538-47. PubMed ID: 19457156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The need for validation of statistical methods for estimating respiratory virus-attributable hospitalization.
Gilca R; De Serres G; Skowronski D; Boivin G; Buckeridge DL
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Oct; 170(7):925-36. PubMed ID: 19679751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Logical checking function increases the accuracy of data entry in the patterns of care study.
Kinoshita K; Teshima T; Ohno Y; Inoue T; Yamashita T; Hiraoka M; Mitsuhashi N; Sumi M
Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Feb; 179(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 12590321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Efficient sampling approaches to address confounding in database studies.
Hanley JA; Dendukuri N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2009 Feb; 18(1):81-105. PubMed ID: 18815164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Primer: administrative health databases in observational studies of drug effects--advantages and disadvantages.
Suissa S; Garbe E
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2007 Dec; 3(12):725-32. PubMed ID: 18037932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Applicability of large databases in outcomes research.
Malay S; Shauver MJ; Chung KC
J Hand Surg Am; 2012 Jul; 37(7):1437-46. PubMed ID: 22522104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. GI Epidemiology: databases for epidemiological studies.
Davila JA; El-Serag HB
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2007 Jan; 25(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 17229241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development of an algorithm to identify preoperative medical consultations using administrative data.
Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Buckley DN; Laupacis A
Med Care; 2009 Dec; 47(12):1258-64. PubMed ID: 19890221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simulations showed that validation of database-derived diagnostic criteria based on a small subsample reduced bias.
Abrahamowicz M; Xiao Y; Ionescu-Ittu R; Lacaille D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jun; 60(6):600-9. PubMed ID: 17493519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Coding errors: a comparative analysis of hospital and prospectively collected departmental data.
Khwaja HA; Syed H; Cranston DW
BJU Int; 2002 Feb; 89(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 11856094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing clinical performance in cardiac surgery. Does a specialised clinical database make a difference?
Fortuna D; Vizioli M; Contini A; Ghidoni I; Biagi B; Pacini D; Carnelos G; Grilli R
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 5(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 17670532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
