These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19626435)

  • 21. A new discrimination method for the Concealed Information Test using pretest data and within-individual comparisons.
    Matsuda I; Hirota A; Ogawa T; Takasawa N; Shigemasu K
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Aug; 73(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 16504367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physiological responses in a Concealed Information Test are determined interactively by encoding procedure and questioning format.
    Ambach W; Dummel S; Lüer T; Vaitl D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Sep; 81(3):275-82. PubMed ID: 21803080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fixations and eye-blinks allow for detecting concealed crime related memories.
    Peth J; Kim JS; Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Apr; 88(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 23511446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combining the P300-complex trial-based concealed information test and the reaction time-based autobiographical implicit association test in concealed memory detection.
    Hu X; Rosenfeld JP
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Aug; 49(8):1090-100. PubMed ID: 22681260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Efficacy of repeated psychophysiological detection of deception testing.
    Dollins AB; Cestaro VL; Pettit DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1016-23. PubMed ID: 9729818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Retroactive memory interference: a potential countermeasure technique against psychophysiological knowledge detection methods.
    Gronau N; Elber L; Satran S; Breska A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Biol Psychol; 2015 Mar; 106():68-78. PubMed ID: 25676452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses.
    Verschuere B; Crombez G; De Clercq A; Koster EH
    Psychophysiology; 2004 May; 41(3):461-6. PubMed ID: 15102132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Extracting concealed information from groups.
    Meijer EH; Smulders FT; Merckelbach HL
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1607-9. PubMed ID: 20533975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Detection of concealed information by P3 and frontal EEG asymmetry.
    Matsuda I; Nittono H; Allen JJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2013 Mar; 537():55-9. PubMed ID: 23370285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Does the Guilty Actions Test allow for differentiating guilty participants from informed innocents? A re-examination.
    Gamer M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Apr; 76(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20114064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Behavioral and physiological measures in the detection of concealed information.
    Gronau N; Ben-Shakhar G; Cohen A
    J Appl Psychol; 2005 Jan; 90(1):147-58. PubMed ID: 15641895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime.
    Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Psychophysiological and behavioral measures for detecting concealed information: the role of memory for crime details.
    Nahari G; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Jun; 48(6):733-44. PubMed ID: 20958308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Gamer M; Merckelbach H; Ben-Shakhar G
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):593-604. PubMed ID: 26787599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The role of psychophysiology in forensic assessments: deception detection, ERPs, and virtual reality mock crime scenarios.
    Mertens R; Allen JJ
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Mar; 45(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 17995914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of countermeasures on the validity of the Concealed Information Test.
    Peth J; Suchotzki K; Gamer M
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Sep; 53(9):1429-40. PubMed ID: 27338719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Manipulating item proportion and deception reveals crucial dissociation between behavioral, autonomic, and neural indices of concealed information.
    Suchotzki K; Verschuere B; Peth J; Crombez G; Gamer M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Feb; 36(2):427-39. PubMed ID: 25277495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Is the CIT susceptible to misleading information? A constructive replication.
    Klein Selle N; Waxman D; Volz K; Ambach W; Ben-Shakhar G
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):646-655. PubMed ID: 33227162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Novel, ERP-based, concealed information detection: Combining recognition-based and feedback-evoked ERPs.
    Sai L; Lin X; Rosenfeld JP; Sang B; Hu X; Fu G
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Feb; 114():13-22. PubMed ID: 26638760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The "good cop, bad cop" effect in the RT-based concealed information test: exploring the effect of emotional expressions displayed by a virtual investigator.
    Varga M; Visu-Petra G; Miclea M; Visu-Petra L
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0116087. PubMed ID: 25699516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.