These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19626694)
1. Fluoroscopy vs. traditional guided femoral arterial access and the use of closure devices: a randomized controlled trial. Abu-Fadel MS; Sparling JM; Zacharias SJ; Aston CE; Saucedo JF; Schechter E; Hennebry TA Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 74(4):533-9. PubMed ID: 19626694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fluoroscopy guided vascular access: asking the right question, but getting the wrong answer? Turi ZG Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Oct; 74(4):540-2. PubMed ID: 19780060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pitfalls associated with the use of current recommendations for fluoroscopy-guided common femoral artery access. Yaganti V; Mejevoi N; Hasan O; Cohen M; Wasty N Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Mar; 81(4):674-9. PubMed ID: 23292908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Imaging or trusting on surface anatomy? A comparison between fluoroscopic guidance and anatomic landmarks for femoral artery access in diagnostic cardiac catheterization. A randomized control trial. Chinikar M; Ahmadi A; Heidarzadeh A; Sadeghipour P Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2014 Jan; 29(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 23959379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized comparison of a novel bioabsorbable vascular closure device versus manual compression in the achievement of hemostasis after percutaneous femoral procedures: the ECLIPSE (Ensure's Vascular Closure Device Speeds Hemostasis Trial). Wong SC; Bachinsky W; Cambier P; Stoler R; Aji J; Rogers JH; Hermiller J; Nair R; Hutman H; Wang H; JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Aug; 2(8):785-93. PubMed ID: 19695549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective, randomized study comparing ultrasound versus fluoroscopic guided femoral arterial access in noncardiac vascular patients. Stone P; Campbell J; Thompson S; Walker J J Vasc Surg; 2020 Jul; 72(1):259-267. PubMed ID: 31980242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rationale and design of a randomised clinical trial comparing vascular closure device and manual compression to achieve haemostasis after diagnostic coronary angiography: the Instrumental Sealing of ARterial puncture site - CLOSURE device versus manual compression (ISAR-CLOSURE) trial. Xhepa E; Byrne RA; Schulz S; Helde S; Gewalt S; Cassese S; Linhardt M; Ibrahim T; Mehilli J; Hoppe K; Grupp K; Kufner S; Böttiger C; Hoppmann P; Burgdorf C; Fusaro M; Ott I; Schneider S; Hengstenberg C; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; EuroIntervention; 2014 Jun; 10(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 24952057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height. Sartorius B; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Hoffmann U; Lang S; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Feb; 17(1):64. PubMed ID: 28209184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prophylactic Retrograde Distal Common Femoral Access as a Bail-out Strategy in Patients with Increased Risk for Femoral Access Complication During Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement. Sanghvi K; Swarup S; Burns P; Kovach R; Ross R; Soussa T Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2020 Apr; 21(4):481-485. PubMed ID: 31375463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. StarClose vascular closure system (VCS) is safe and effective in patients who ambulate early following successful femoral artery access closure--results from the RISE clinical trial. Burke MN; Hermiller J; Jaff MR Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jul; 80(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 22162141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasound guidance with the traditional palpation and fluoroscopy method for the common femoral artery puncture. Gedikoglu M; Oguzkurt L; Gur S; Andic C; Sariturk C; Ozkan U Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1187-92. PubMed ID: 23592533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and effectiveness of a novel vascular closure device: a prospective study of the ExoSeal compared to the Angio-Seal and ProGlide. Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Rothe H; Müller P; Krüger J; Neubauer H; Klein-Wiele O; Mügge A; Kahlert P; Erbel R J Endovasc Ther; 2014 Dec; 21(6):822-8. PubMed ID: 25453885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Puncture in Women. Gewalt SM; Helde SM; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Schmidt R; Bott-Flügel L; Hoppe K; Ott I; Hieber J; Morath T; Byrne RA; Kufner S; Cassese S; Hoppmann P; Fusaro M; Schunkert H; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Schüpke S; Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Aug; 11(8):e006074. PubMed ID: 30354782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Utilization of collagen-based vascular closure devices in patients with severe peripheral artery disease. Kara K; Mahabadi AA; Berg MH; Kahlert P; Longwitz D; Erbel R; Bollow M J Invasive Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 25(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 23293170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Percutaneous Plug-Based Arteriotomy Closure Device for Large-Bore Access: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Van Mieghem NM; Latib A; van der Heyden J; van Gils L; Daemen J; Sorzano T; Ligthart J; Witberg K; de Kroon T; Maor N; Mangieri A; Montorfano M; de Jaegere PP; Colombo A; Roubin G JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(6):613-619. PubMed ID: 28335899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]