308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19627087)
1. Modern homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors: which structural template to use?
Mobarec JC; Sanchez R; Filizola M
J Med Chem; 2009 Aug; 52(16):5207-16. PubMed ID: 19627087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring the structure of opioid receptors with homology modeling based on single and multiple templates and subsequent docking: a comparative study.
Bera I; Laskar A; Ghoshal N
J Mol Model; 2011 May; 17(5):1207-21. PubMed ID: 20661609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. X-ray structure breakthroughs in the GPCR transmembrane region.
Topiol S; Sabio M
Biochem Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 78(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19447219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative sequence and structural analyses of G-protein-coupled receptor crystal structures and implications for molecular models.
Worth CL; Kleinau G; Krause G
PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e7011. PubMed ID: 19756152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficiency of Homology Modeling Assisted Molecular Docking in G-protein Coupled Receptors.
Bhunia SS; Saxena AK
Curr Top Med Chem; 2021; 21(4):269-294. PubMed ID: 32901584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ligand-steered modeling and docking: A benchmarking study in class A G-protein-coupled receptors.
Phatak SS; Gatica EA; Cavasotto CN
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2119-28. PubMed ID: 21080692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A benchmarking study on virtual ligand screening against homology models of human GPCRs.
Lim VJY; Du W; Chen YZ; Fan H
Proteins; 2018 Sep; 86(9):978-989. PubMed ID: 30051928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing GPCR homology models constructed from templates of various transmembrane sequence identities: Binding mode prediction and docking enrichment.
Loo JSE; Emtage AL; Ng KW; Yong ASJ; Doughty SW
J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Mar; 80():38-47. PubMed ID: 29306746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Homology Modeling of Class A G-Protein-Coupled Receptors in the Age of the Structure Boom.
Tiss A; Ben Boubaker R; Henrion D; Guissouma H; Chabbert M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2315():73-97. PubMed ID: 34302671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors with X-ray structures on the rise.
Yarnitzky T; Levit A; Niv MY
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2010 May; 13(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 20443165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving homology modeling of G-protein coupled receptors through multiple-template derived conserved inter-residue interactions.
Chaudhari R; Heim AJ; Li Z
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 May; 29(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25503850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of virtual screening against GPCR homology models: Impact of template selection and treatment of binding site plasticity.
Jaiteh M; Rodríguez-Espigares I; Selent J; Carlsson J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Mar; 16(3):e1007680. PubMed ID: 32168319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Current assessment of docking into GPCR crystal structures and homology models: successes, challenges, and guidelines.
Beuming T; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3263-77. PubMed ID: 23121495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Template selection and refinement considerations for modelling aminergic GPCR-ligand complexes.
Urmi KF; Finch AM; Griffith R
J Mol Graph Model; 2017 Sep; 76():488-503. PubMed ID: 28818718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FoldGPCR: structure prediction protocol for the transmembrane domain of G protein-coupled receptors from class A.
Michino M; Chen J; Stevens RC; Brooks CL
Proteins; 2010 Aug; 78(10):2189-201. PubMed ID: 20544957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the applicability of GPCR homology models to computer-aided drug discovery: a comparison between in silico and crystal structures of the beta2-adrenergic receptor.
Costanzi S
J Med Chem; 2008 May; 51(10):2907-14. PubMed ID: 18442228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. GPCR homology model template selection benchmarking: Global versus local similarity measures.
Castleman PN; Sears CK; Cole JA; Baker DL; Parrill AL
J Mol Graph Model; 2019 Jan; 86():235-246. PubMed ID: 30390544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PREDICT modeling and in-silico screening for G-protein coupled receptors.
Shacham S; Marantz Y; Bar-Haim S; Kalid O; Warshaviak D; Avisar N; Inbal B; Heifetz A; Fichman M; Topf M; Naor Z; Noiman S; Becker OM
Proteins; 2004 Oct; 57(1):51-86. PubMed ID: 15326594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Homology modeling of a Class A GPCR in the inactive conformation: A quantitative analysis of the correlation between model/template sequence identity and model accuracy.
Costanzi S; Skorski M; Deplano A; Habermehl B; Mendoza M; Wang K; Biederman M; Dawson J; Gao J
J Mol Graph Model; 2016 Nov; 70():140-152. PubMed ID: 27723562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure modeling of all identified G protein-coupled receptors in the human genome.
Zhang Y; Devries ME; Skolnick J
PLoS Comput Biol; 2006 Feb; 2(2):e13. PubMed ID: 16485037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
