These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
586 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19627788)
21. Effect of alendronate on endosseous implant integration: an in vivo study in rabbits. Chacon GE; Stine EA; Larsen PE; Beck FM; McGlumphy EA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 64(7):1005-9. PubMed ID: 16781331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Characterization and biocompatibility of a titanium dental implant with a laser irradiated and dual-acid etched surface. Hsu SH; Liu BS; Lin WH; Chiang HC; Huang SC; Cheng SS Biomed Mater Eng; 2007; 17(1):53-68. PubMed ID: 17264387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration. Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Does surface anodisation of titanium implants change osseointegration and make their extraction from bone any easier? Langhoff JD; Mayer J; Faber L; Kaestner SB; Guibert G; Zlinszky K; Auer JA; von Rechenberg B Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2008; 21(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 18536845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment. Fawzy AS; Amer MA Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs. Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Wennerberg A; Ektessabi A; Albrektsson T; Johansson C; Andersson B Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 9274077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface. Ferguson SJ; Broggini N; Wieland M; de Wild M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Buser D J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit femur coated with biomimetic deposited Ca-P coating. Fuming H; Guoli Y; Xiaoxiang W; Shifang Z J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):754-65. PubMed ID: 18466279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surface characterizations of variously treated titanium materials. Lim YJ; Oshida Y; Andres CJ; Barco MT Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 11432653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the grit-blasted surface of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae. Park YS; Yi KY; Lee IS; Han CH; Jung YC Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 15747671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits. Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Osseointegration of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages: a rabbit study. Park KH; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee JB; Kim SH; Lim YJ J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jul; 34(7):517-27. PubMed ID: 17559620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants. Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of microrough surface treatment on miniscrews used as orthodontic anchors. Chang CS; Lee TM; Chang CH; Liu JK Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1178-84. PubMed ID: 19531105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits. Queiroz TP; Souza FÁ; Guastaldi AC; Margonar R; Garcia-Júnior IR; Hochuli-Vieira E Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 22540325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effect of water pyrolysis on the removal torque of titanium implant inserted in rabbit tibias. Se-Ho P; Bin SW; Ho KK; Ju SD; Sung-Am C Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Feb; 22(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 20678134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Torque removal force for osseointegrated implants--two experimental studies. Lownie JF; Betts PA; Bryant RS; Cleaton-Jones P S Afr J Surg; 2008 Feb; 46(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 18468418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of the soft tissue interface at titanium implants with different surface treatments: experimental study on rabbits. Ungersböck A; Pohler O; Perren SM Biomed Mater Eng; 1994; 4(4):317-25. PubMed ID: 7950879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]