These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19628736)
1. A new interocular suppression technique for measuring sensory eye dominance. Yang E; Blake R; McDonald JE Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):588-93. PubMed ID: 19628736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing the generalizability of eye dominance across binocular rivalry, onset rivalry, and continuous flash suppression. Ding Y; Naber M; Gayet S; Van der Stigchel S; Paffen CLE J Vis; 2018 Jun; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 30029217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of tests for quantifying sensory eye dominance. Bossi M; Hamm LM; Dahlmann-Noor A; Dakin SC Vision Res; 2018 Dec; 153():60-69. PubMed ID: 30292725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A fresh look at interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Lee SH; Blake R Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(10):983-91. PubMed ID: 15031091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On Sensory Eye Dominance Revealed by Binocular Integrative and Binocular Competitive Stimuli. Han C; He ZJ; Ooi TL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Oct; 59(12):5140-5148. PubMed ID: 30372739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of Interocular Contrast Difference on Stereopsis in Observers With Sensory Eye Dominance. Han C; He ZJ; Ooi TL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2019 Jul; 60(8):3178-3186. PubMed ID: 31335943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of dominant and nondominant eyes in binocular rivalry. Handa T; Mukuno K; Uozato H; Niida T; Shoji N; Shimizu K Optom Vis Sci; 2004 May; 81(5):377-83. PubMed ID: 15181364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dichoptic Perceptual Training and Sensory Eye Dominance Plasticity in Normal Vision. Kam KY; Chang DHF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2021 Jun; 62(7):12. PubMed ID: 34106211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensory ocular dominance based on resolution acuity, contrast sensitivity and alignment sensitivity. Suttle C; Alexander J; Liu M; Ng S; Poon J; Tran T Clin Exp Optom; 2009 Jan; 92(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 18691218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye dominance in binocular viewing conditions. Johansson J; Seimyr GÖ; Pansell T J Vis; 2015; 15(9):21. PubMed ID: 26230983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Deconstructing Interocular Suppression: Attention and Divisive Normalization. Li HH; Carrasco M; Heeger DJ PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Oct; 11(10):e1004510. PubMed ID: 26517321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dichoptic Attentive Motion Tracking is Biased Toward the Nonamblyopic Eye in Strabismic Amblyopia. Chow A; Giaschi D; Thompson B Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 59(11):4572-4580. PubMed ID: 30242356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method for quantifying ocular dominance using the balancing technique. Handa T; Shimizu K; Uozato H; Shoji N; Ishikawa H Am Orthopt J; 2012; 62():77-86. PubMed ID: 22848115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Novel Dichoptic Optokinetic Nystagmus Paradigm to Quantify Interocular Suppression in Monocular Amblyopia. Wen W; Wu S; Wang S; Zou L; Liu Y; Liu R; Zhang P; He S; Liu H Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Oct; 59(12):4775-4782. PubMed ID: 30304459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative measurement of ocular dominance using binocular rivalry induced by retinometers. Handa T; Uozato H; Higa R; Nitta M; Kawamorita T; Ishikawa H; Shoji N; Shimizu K J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May; 32(5):831-6. PubMed ID: 16765802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]