These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19629323)

  • 1. Hearing aids in children: the importance of the verification and validation processes.
    Rissatto MR; Novaes BC
    Pro Fono; 2009; 21(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 19629323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Manufacturer's Prefit and Real-Ear Fitting on the Predicted Speech Perception of Children with Severe to Profound Hearing Loss.
    Quar TK; Umat C; Chew YY
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 May; 30(5):346-356. PubMed ID: 30461383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method.
    Bagatto M; Moodie S; Scollie S; Seewald R; Moodie S; Pumford J; Liu KP
    Trends Amplif; 2005; 9(4):199-226. PubMed ID: 16424946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally.
    Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Marriage J
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Dec; 35(6):339-53. PubMed ID: 11848176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities.
    Ching TYC; Zhang VW; Johnson EE; Van Buynder P; Hou S; Burns L; Button L; Flynn C; McGhie K
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S41-S54. PubMed ID: 28971727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
    Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulator Verification Is Potentially Beneficial for the Fitting of Softband Bone Conduction Hearing Devices in Young Children.
    Sun L; Ping L; Fan X; Wang J; Chen X
    Otol Neurotol; 2024 Aug; 45(7):e500-e508. PubMed ID: 38924037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Open fitting: performance verification of receiver in the ear and receiver in the aid.
    Mondelli MF; Garcia TM; Hashimoto FM; Rocha AV
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2015; 81(3):270-5. PubMed ID: 25382428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fitting hearing aids in children with severe hearing loss.
    Brokx JP; Snik AF; Pepers-van Lith AI
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1997; 46():38-42. PubMed ID: 9309837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preferred listening levels of children who use hearing aids: comparison to prescriptive targets.
    Scollie SD; Seewald RC; Moodie KS; Dekok K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2000 Apr; 11(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 10783926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.
    McCreery RW; Walker EA; Spratford M; Bentler R; Holte L; Roush P; Oleson J; Van Buren J; Moeller MP
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36 Suppl 1(0 1):24S-37S. PubMed ID: 26731156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices.
    Bosman AJ; Mylanus EA; Hol MK; Snik AF
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bilateral hearing aids--effects and consequences from a user perspective.
    Köjbler S; Rosenhall U; Hansson H
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(4):223-35. PubMed ID: 11845991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups.
    Pfiffner F; Kompis M; Stieger C
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimising hearing aid output to paediatric prescriptive targets improves outcomes in children.
    Amri NA; Quar TK; Chong FY; Bagatto M
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Nov; 61(11):924-931. PubMed ID: 34859745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of an 'intuitive' NHS hearing aid prescription method with DSL 4.1 targets for amplification.
    Parsons JO; Clark CR
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Sep; 41(6):357-62. PubMed ID: 12353608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.