These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19629806)

  • 21. Automation, task difficulty, and aircrew performance.
    Bowers C; Thornton C; Braun C; Morgan BB; Salas E
    Mil Psychol; 1998; 10(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 11541776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of automation reliability on error detection and attention to auditory stimuli in a multi-tasking environment.
    Ferraro JC; Mouloua M
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Feb; 91():103303. PubMed ID: 33176254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.
    Szalma JL; Taylor GS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 21688932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cognitive conflict in human-automation interactions: a psychophysiological study.
    Dehais F; Causse M; Vachon F; Tremblay S
    Appl Ergon; 2012 May; 43(3):588-95. PubMed ID: 21992968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of display design on performance in a simulated ship navigation environment.
    Sauer J; Wastell DG; Hockey GR; Crawshaw CM; Ishak M; Downing JC
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):329-47. PubMed ID: 12028719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The interaction of spatial ability and motor learning in the transfer of training from a simulator to a real task.
    Tracey MR; Lathan CE
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():521-7. PubMed ID: 11317801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quantitative assessment of effects of visual scanning on concurrent task performance.
    Liu Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Mar; 39(3):382-99. PubMed ID: 8849492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. On the independence of compliance and reliance: are automation false alarms worse than misses?
    Dixon SR; Wickens CD; McCarley JS
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):564-72. PubMed ID: 17702209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity.
    Ahmed N; de Visser E; Shaw T; Mohamed-Ameen A; Campbell M; Parasuraman R
    Ergonomics; 2014; 57(3):295-318. PubMed ID: 24308716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Performance, workload, and fatigue changes associated with automation.
    Harris WC; Hancock PA; Arthur EJ; Caird JK
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1995; 5(2):169-85. PubMed ID: 11540255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments.
    Rayman R; Croome K; Galbraith N; McClure R; Morady R; Peterson S; Smith S; Subotic V; Van Wynsberghe A; Primak S
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Sep; 2(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 17520635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The predictive qualities of operator characteristics for process control performance: the influence of personality and cognitive variables.
    Burkolter D; Kluge A; Sauer J; Ritzmann S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Mar; 52(3):302-11. PubMed ID: 18937088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A task-specific analysis of the benefit of haptic shared control during telemanipulation.
    Boessenkool H; Abbink DA; Heemskerk CJ; van der Helm FC; Wildenbeest JG
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 24808263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characterizing team performance in network-centric operations: philosophical and methodological issues.
    Bolia RS; Nelson WT
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 May; 78(5 Suppl):B71-6. PubMed ID: 17547307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using Modeling and Simulation to Predict Operator Performance and Automation-Induced Complacency With Robotic Automation: A Case Study and Empirical Validation.
    Wickens CD; Sebok A; Li H; Sarter N; Gacy AM
    Hum Factors; 2015 Sep; 57(6):959-75. PubMed ID: 25850111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cognitive task load in a naval ship control centre: from identification to prediction.
    Grootjen M; Neerincx MA; Veltman JA
    Ergonomics; 2006 Oct 10-22; 49(12-13):1238-64. PubMed ID: 17008255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of automation of information-processing functions on teamwork.
    Wright MC; Kaber DB
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):50-66. PubMed ID: 15960086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of a brain-based adaptive system and a manual adaptable system for invoking automation.
    Bailey NR; Scerbo MW; Freeman FG; Mikulka PJ; Scott LA
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(4):693-709. PubMed ID: 17240718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Automation trust and attention allocation in multitasking workspace.
    Karpinsky ND; Chancey ET; Palmer DB; Yamani Y
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jul; 70():194-201. PubMed ID: 29866311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The human/robot interface.
    Wiker SF
    Aerosp Am; 1993 Oct; 31(10):30-3. PubMed ID: 11541029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.