These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19630287)
21. [Rebasing of removable partial prosthesis for total substitution of the resin]. de Fiori SR; Mazzadi G Ars Curandi Odontol; 1978 Jun; 5(3):34-6. PubMed ID: 363114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Funtional impression in skeletonized removable partial prosthesis]. Bene G; Oltean D Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Stomatol; 1974; 21(4):337-40. PubMed ID: 4283308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. How good are our impressions? An audit of alginate impression quality in the production of removable prostheses. Horwitz R Dent Update; 2014 May; 41(4):366-7, 369. PubMed ID: 24930259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Class I and II impressions]. Sebbah F Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(4):300-2. PubMed ID: 794972 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. A functional impression technique for the unsuccessful mandibular denture. Thomas CJ J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1978 Jul; 33(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 393739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Using diagnostic impressions to evaluate the fit of existing removable prostheses. O'Callaghan MG J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 11575021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. An alternative impression technique for implant-retained overdentures. Uludag B; Celik G J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):377-8. PubMed ID: 17098503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Cast metal bars used for laboratory processing of bar-supported prostheses. Saunders TR; Oliver NA J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Dec; 70(6):541-2. PubMed ID: 8277444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Single-stage combined impression in the treatment of dentition defects with partial prosthesis]. Papazian E Stomatologiia (Sofiia); 1979; 61(2):114-6. PubMed ID: 400458 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [The use of tissue conditioners as impression materials]. Gonzalez A; Morais Caldas F; Lordelo J Stoma (Lisb); 1988; 1(9):39-44. PubMed ID: 3077214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [How to fix partial dentures with denture bases]. Matsumoto T Shiyo; 1984 May; 32(5):176-9. PubMed ID: 6389999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Mixed impressions (alginate and zinc oxide eugenol) in posterior bilaterally edentulous patients]. Braun AA; de Vargas HM; Weigert F; Mazzaquatro W Rev Gaucha Odontol; 1975; 23(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 802326 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Stabilizing the individualized acrylic tray for partial denture impression. Zach GA Gen Dent; 1979; 27(4):28-30. PubMed ID: 398818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Simplification test in the choice of impression techniques for removable partial dentures]. Decup F; Renault P Inf Dent; 1990 Nov; 72(42):4083-90. PubMed ID: 2258231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Time-saving method for the fabrication of a definitive cast for an implant-supported prosthesis. Daher T; Meserkhani PV; Baba NZ; Morgano SM J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):70-1. PubMed ID: 17631175 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials. Hassan AK East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fixed-prosthesis impressions: a rubber base reline ttechnic. Nepola SR Dent Surv; 1971 Jan; 47(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 4925612 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]