219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19631485)
1. Magnetic resonance imaging for secondary assessment of breast density in a high-risk cohort.
Klifa C; Carballido-Gamio J; Wilmes L; Laprie A; Shepherd J; Gibbs J; Fan B; Noworolski S; Hylton N
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 19631485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
van Engeland S; Snoeren PR; Huisman H; Boetes C; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Mar; 25(3):273-82. PubMed ID: 16524084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast Density Analysis with Automated Whole-Breast Ultrasound: Comparison with 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen JH; Lee YW; Chan SW; Yeh DC; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1211-20. PubMed ID: 26831342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative analysis of breast parenchymal patterns using 3D fibroglandular tissues segmented based on MRI.
Nie K; Chang D; Chen JH; Hsu CC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):217-26. PubMed ID: 20175484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of 3-point Dixon imaging and fuzzy C-means clustering methods for breast density measurement.
Clendenen TV; Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A; Moy L; Pike MC; Rusinek H; Kim S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Aug; 38(2):474-81. PubMed ID: 23292922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimation of breast density: an adaptive moment preserving method for segmentation of fibroglandular tissue in breast magnetic resonance images.
Wei CH; Li Y; Huang PJ; Gwo CY; Harms SE
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Apr; 81(4):e618-24. PubMed ID: 22266417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?
Hansen NL; Kuhl CK; Barabasch A; Strobel K; Schrading S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 24446230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast segmentation and density estimation in breast MRI: a fully automatic framework.
Gubern-Mérida A; Kallenberg M; Mann RM; Martí R; Karssemeijer N
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2015 Jan; 19(1):349-57. PubMed ID: 25561456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the high-risk breast: Apparent diffusion coefficient values and their relationship to breast density.
O'Flynn EA; Wilson RM; Allen SD; Locke I; Scurr E; deSouza NM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Apr; 39(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 24038529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts.
Giuliano V; Giuliano C
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):480-6. PubMed ID: 23116728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI.
Nie K; Chang D; Chen JH; Shih TC; Hsu CC; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):227-33. PubMed ID: 20175485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel approach to evaluating breast density utilizing ultrasound tomography.
Glide C; Duric N; Littrup P
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):744-53. PubMed ID: 17388192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atlas-based probabilistic fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI.
Wu S; Weinstein S; Kontos D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):437-45. PubMed ID: 23286078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Automatic identification and classification of characteristic kinetic curves of breast lesions on DCE-MRI.
Chen W; Giger ML; Bick U; Newstead GM
Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2878-87. PubMed ID: 16964864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed-aided diagnosis (CAD) in the detection of breast cancer.
Dromain C; Boyer B; Ferré R; Canale S; Delaloge S; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Mar; 82(3):417-23. PubMed ID: 22939365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Principles and methods for automatic and semi-automatic tissue segmentation in MRI data.
Wang L; Chitiboi T; Meine H; Günther M; Hahn HK
MAGMA; 2016 Apr; 29(2):95-110. PubMed ID: 26755062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Co-registration of MR-mammography and X-ray mammography.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Hopp T; Ruiter NV; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81 Suppl 1():S27-9. PubMed ID: 23083591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the usefulness of a novel MRI-based breast density estimation algorithm in a cohort of women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: the UK MARIBS study.
Thompson DJ; Leach MO; Kwan-Lim G; Gayther SA; Ramus SJ; Warsi I; Lennard F; Khazen M; Bryant E; Reed S; Boggis CR; Evans DG; Eeles RA; Easton DF; Warren RM;
Breast Cancer Res; 2009; 11(6):R80. PubMed ID: 19903338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
