BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19631858)

  • 1. Abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter: a comparison of ultrasound measurements with those from standard and three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction.
    Manning BJ; Kristmundsson T; Sonesson B; Resch T
    J Vasc Surg; 2009 Aug; 50(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 19631858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Maximum diameter measurements of aortic aneurysms on axial CT images after endovascular aneurysm repair: sufficient for follow-up?
    Baumueller S; Nguyen TD; Goetti RP; Lachat M; Seifert B; Pfammatter T; Frauenfelder T
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2011 Dec; 34(6):1182-9. PubMed ID: 20945067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasound-determined diameter measurements are more accurate than axial computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.
    Han SM; Patel K; Rowe VL; Perese S; Bond A; Weaver FA
    J Vasc Surg; 2010 Jun; 51(6):1381-7; discussion 1387-9. PubMed ID: 20488320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Bredahl K; Sandholt B; Lönn L; Rouet L; Ardon R; Eiberg JP; Sillesen H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 49(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 25662155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional ultrasonography measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair.
    Causey MW; Jayaraj A; Leotta DF; Paun M; Beach KW; Kohler TR; Zierler ER; Starnes BW
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 27(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 22749436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is ultrasound more accurate than axial computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter?
    Sprouse LR; Meier GH; Parent FN; DeMasi RJ; Glickman MH; Barber GA
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Jul; 28(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 15177228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multidimensional growth measurements of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
    Martufi G; Auer M; Roy J; Swedenborg J; Sakalihasan N; Panuccio G; Gasser TC
    J Vasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 58(3):748-55. PubMed ID: 23611712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Discrepancies in determination of abdominal aortic aneurysms maximum diameter and growth rate, using axial and orhtogonal computed tomography measurements.
    Kontopodis N; Metaxa E; Gionis M; Papaharilaou Y; Ioannou CV
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1398-403. PubMed ID: 23727377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional workstation is useful for measuring the correct size of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameters.
    Ihara T; Komori K; Yamamoto K; Kobayashi M; Banno H; Kodama A
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2013 Feb; 27(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 22951061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize.
    Cayne NS; Veith FJ; Lipsitz EC; Ohki T; Mehta M; Gargiulo N; Suggs WD; Rozenblit A; Ricci Z; Timaran CH
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Apr; 39(4):811-5. PubMed ID: 15071447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction justified before endovascular aortic aneurysm repair?
    Sprouse LR; Meier GH; Parent FN; DeMasi RJ; Stokes GK; LeSar CJ; Marcinczyk MJ; Mendoza B
    J Vasc Surg; 2004 Sep; 40(3):443-7. PubMed ID: 15337871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The difference between ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) measurements of aortic diameter increases with aortic diameter: analysis of axial images of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter in normal and aneurysmal aortas. The Tromsø Study, 1994-1995.
    Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Kumar S; Arnesen E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Aug; 28(2):158-67. PubMed ID: 15234697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements obtained with ultrasound and computed tomography: Is there a difference?
    Sprouse LR; Meier GH; Lesar CJ; Demasi RJ; Sood J; Parent FN; Marcinzyck MJ; Gayle RG
    J Vasc Surg; 2003 Sep; 38(3):466-71; discussion 471-2. PubMed ID: 12947257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intra- and interobserver variability in the measurements of abdominal aortic and common iliac artery diameter with computed tomography. The Tromsø study.
    Singh K; Jacobsen BK; Solberg S; Bønaa KH; Kumar S; Bajic R; Arnesen E
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2003 May; 25(5):399-407. PubMed ID: 12713777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraobserver and interobserver variability of 64-row computed tomography abdominal aortic aneurysm neck measurements.
    Diehm N; Kickuth R; Gahl B; Do DD; Schmidli J; Rattunde H; Baumgartner I; Dick F
    J Vasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 45(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 17264000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography.
    Jaakkola P; Hippeläinen M; Farin P; Rytkönen H; Kainulainen S; Partanen K
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1996 Aug; 12(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 8760988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations.
    Dugas A; Therasse E; Kauffmann C; Tang A; Elkouri S; Nozza A; Giroux MF; Oliva VL; Soulez G
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2012 Aug; 35(4):779-87. PubMed ID: 21863355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What imaging studies are necessary for abdominal aortic endograft sizing? A prospective blinded study using conventional computed tomography, aortography, and three-dimensional computed tomography.
    Parker MV; O'Donnell SD; Chang AS; Johnson CA; Gillespie DL; Goff JM; Rasmussen TE; Rich NM
    J Vasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 41(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15767998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automated software supported versus manual aorto-iliac diameter measurements in CT angiography of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms: assessment of inter- and intraobserver variation.
    Diehm N; Baumgartner I; Silvestro A; Herrmann P; Triller J; Schmidli J; Do DD; Dinkel HP
    Vasa; 2005 Nov; 34(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 16363281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in measurement of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Detection and Management Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group.
    Lederle FA; Wilson SE; Johnson GR; Reinke DB; Littooy FN; Acher CW; Messina LM; Ballard DJ; Ansel HJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1995 Jun; 21(6):945-52. PubMed ID: 7776474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.