These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19632666)

  • 1. The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests.
    Sauer J; Seibel K; Rüttinger B
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 19632666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion.
    Sauer J; Sonderegger A
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 18691696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures.
    Sonderegger A; Sauer J
    Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1350-61. PubMed ID: 19851903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability.
    Sonderegger A; Sauer J
    Appl Ergon; 2010 May; 41(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 19892317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Designing interactive consumer products: utility of paper prototypes and effectiveness of enhanced control labelling.
    Sauer J; Franke H; Ruettinger B
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 17498642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. From an expert-driven paper guideline to a user-centred decision support system: a usability comparison study.
    Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23684240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ecological performance of electrical consumer products: the influence of automation and information-based measures.
    Sauer J; Wiese BS; Rüttinger B
    Appl Ergon; 2004 Jan; 35(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 14985139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Paper prototypes for the detection of stereotype violations in (medical) device operation - are they good enough?
    Hallbeck MS; Koneczny S; Smith J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():109-11. PubMed ID: 19377125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
    Peute LW; Jaspers MW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Designing for the home: a comparative study of support aids for central heating systems.
    Sauer J; Wastell DG; Schmeink C
    Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 18433730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. User involvement in the early stages of the development of an aircraft warning system.
    Noyes JM; Starr AF; Frankish CR
    Behav Inf Technol; 1996; 15(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 11541759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of an e-learning system for occupational medicine: usability issues.
    Mazzoleni MC; Rognoni C; Finozzi E; Giorgi I; Pugliese F; Pagani M; Pimbriani M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():579-84. PubMed ID: 18487793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The importance of usability in product choice: a mobile phone case study.
    Mack Z; Sharples S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1514-28. PubMed ID: 19941184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application.
    Kushniruk AW; Triola MM; Borycki EM; Stein B; Kannry JL
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):519-26. PubMed ID: 16043081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of protoype medium on usability testing.
    Boothe C; Strawderman L; Hosea E
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 23668779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usability engineering for augmented reality: employing user-based studies to inform design.
    Gabbard JL; Swan JE
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 18369261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of two hospital bed design features on physical demands and usability during brake engagement and patient transportation: a repeated measures experimental study.
    Kim S; Barker LM; Jia B; Agnew MJ; Nussbaum MA
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 19027904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
    Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
    Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal study of usability in health care: does time heal?
    Kjeldskov J; Skov MB; Stage J
    Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):e135-43. PubMed ID: 18757234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability.
    Stock SE; Davies DK; Wehmeyer ML; Palmer SB
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Dec; 52(12):1155-64. PubMed ID: 18647214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.