134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19632666)
1. The influence of user expertise and prototype fidelity in usability tests.
Sauer J; Seibel K; Rüttinger B
Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):130-40. PubMed ID: 19632666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of prototype fidelity and aesthetics of design in usability tests: effects on user behaviour, subjective evaluation and emotion.
Sauer J; Sonderegger A
Appl Ergon; 2009 Jul; 40(4):670-7. PubMed ID: 18691696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of laboratory set-up in usability tests: effects on user performance, subjective ratings and physiological measures.
Sonderegger A; Sauer J
Ergonomics; 2009 Nov; 52(11):1350-61. PubMed ID: 19851903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of design aesthetics in usability testing: effects on user performance and perceived usability.
Sonderegger A; Sauer J
Appl Ergon; 2010 May; 41(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 19892317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Designing interactive consumer products: utility of paper prototypes and effectiveness of enhanced control labelling.
Sauer J; Franke H; Ruettinger B
Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):71-85. PubMed ID: 17498642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. From an expert-driven paper guideline to a user-centred decision support system: a usability comparison study.
Kilsdonk E; Peute LW; Riezebos RJ; Kremer LC; Jaspers MW
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Sep; 59(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 23684240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ecological performance of electrical consumer products: the influence of automation and information-based measures.
Sauer J; Wiese BS; Rüttinger B
Appl Ergon; 2004 Jan; 35(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 14985139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Paper prototypes for the detection of stereotype violations in (medical) device operation - are they good enough?
Hallbeck MS; Koneczny S; Smith J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():109-11. PubMed ID: 19377125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The significance of a usability evaluation of an emerging laboratory order entry system.
Peute LW; Jaspers MW
Int J Med Inform; 2007; 76(2-3):157-68. PubMed ID: 16854617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Designing for the home: a comparative study of support aids for central heating systems.
Sauer J; Wastell DG; Schmeink C
Appl Ergon; 2009 Mar; 40(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 18433730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. User involvement in the early stages of the development of an aircraft warning system.
Noyes JM; Starr AF; Frankish CR
Behav Inf Technol; 1996; 15(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 11541759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of an e-learning system for occupational medicine: usability issues.
Mazzoleni MC; Rognoni C; Finozzi E; Giorgi I; Pugliese F; Pagani M; Pimbriani M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():579-84. PubMed ID: 18487793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of usability in product choice: a mobile phone case study.
Mack Z; Sharples S
Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1514-28. PubMed ID: 19941184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application.
Kushniruk AW; Triola MM; Borycki EM; Stein B; Kannry JL
Int J Med Inform; 2005 Aug; 74(7-8):519-26. PubMed ID: 16043081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of protoype medium on usability testing.
Boothe C; Strawderman L; Hosea E
Appl Ergon; 2013 Nov; 44(6):1033-8. PubMed ID: 23668779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Usability engineering for augmented reality: employing user-based studies to inform design.
Gabbard JL; Swan JE
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2008; 14(3):513-25. PubMed ID: 18369261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of two hospital bed design features on physical demands and usability during brake engagement and patient transportation: a repeated measures experimental study.
Kim S; Barker LM; Jia B; Agnew MJ; Nussbaum MA
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 19027904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of usability and patient preference for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus Flexpen, lilly disposable pen, and a prototype pen: an open-label study.
Haak T; Edelman S; Walter C; Lecointre B; Spollett G
Clin Ther; 2007 Apr; 29(4):650-60. PubMed ID: 17617288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A longitudinal study of usability in health care: does time heal?
Kjeldskov J; Skov MB; Stage J
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jun; 79(6):e135-43. PubMed ID: 18757234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability.
Stock SE; Davies DK; Wehmeyer ML; Palmer SB
J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Dec; 52(12):1155-64. PubMed ID: 18647214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
