These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 19632877)

  • 1. Real-time feedback improves accuracy of manually applied forces during cervical spine mobilisation.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    Man Ther; 2010 Feb; 15(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 19632877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical spine mobilisation forces applied by physiotherapy students.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    Physiotherapy; 2010 Jun; 96(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 20420958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Objective concurrent feedback on force parameters improves performance of lumbar mobilisation, but skill retention declines rapidly.
    Snodgrass SJ; Odelli RA
    Physiotherapy; 2012 Mar; 98(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 22265385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Forces applied to the cervical spine during posteroanterior mobilization.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2009 Jan; 32(1):72-83. PubMed ID: 19121465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Calibration of an instrumented treatment table for measuring manual therapy forces applied to the cervical spine.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    Man Ther; 2008 May; 13(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 17553726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Manual forces applied during cervical mobilization.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007 Jan; 30(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 17224351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of cervical spine mobilization forces applied by experienced and novice physiotherapists.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ; Stojanovski E
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2010 Jul; 40(7):392-401. PubMed ID: 20592483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation.
    Lee RY; McGregor AH; Bull AM; Wragg P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Feb; 20(2):228-31. PubMed ID: 15621330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Learning lumbar spine mobilization: the effects of frequency and self-control of feedback.
    Sheaves EG; Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Feb; 42(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 22030595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Learning spinal manipulation: the importance of augmented feedback relating to various kinetic parameters.
    Descarreaux M; Dugas C; Lalanne K; Vincelette M; Normand MC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 16517384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Teaching suturing and knot-tying skills to medical students: a randomized controlled study comparing computer-based video instruction and (concurrent and summary) expert feedback.
    Xeroulis GJ; Park J; Moulton CA; Reznick RK; Leblanc V; Dubrowski A
    Surgery; 2007 Apr; 141(4):442-9. PubMed ID: 17383520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective assessment of training surgical skills using simulated tissue interface with real-time feedback.
    Rafiq A; Tamariz F; Boanca C; Lavrentyev V; Merrell RC
    J Surg Educ; 2008; 65(4):270-4. PubMed ID: 18707659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attitudes of physical therapist students toward physical therapist assistants before and after full-time clinical internships.
    Cavallo CL; Richter RR
    J Allied Health; 2004; 33(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 15053215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of learning style on instructional multimedia effects on graduate student cognitive and psychomotor performance.
    Smith AR; Cavanaugh C; Jones J; Venn J; Wilson W
    J Allied Health; 2006; 35(3):e182-203. PubMed ID: 19759970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reflective journal writing to obtain student feedback about their learning during the study of chronic musculoskeletal conditions.
    Williams RM; Wessel J
    J Allied Health; 2004; 33(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15053216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Three-dimensional manual contact force evaluation of graded perpendicular push force delivery by second-year physiotherapy students during simple feedback training.
    van Zoest GG; Staes FF; Stappaerts KH
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2007; 30(6):438-49. PubMed ID: 17693334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verbal feedback from an expert is more effective than self-accessed feedback about motion efficiency in learning new surgical skills.
    Porte MC; Xeroulis G; Reznick RK; Dubrowski A
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jan; 193(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 17188099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simple anatomical information improves the accuracy of locating specific spinous processes during manual examination of the low back.
    Phillips DR; Barnard S; Mullee MA; Hurley MV
    Man Ther; 2009 Jun; 14(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 18511330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of importance of the doctoral degree with students' perceptions and anticipated activities reflecting professionalism.
    Johanson MA
    Phys Ther; 2005 Aug; 85(8):766-81. PubMed ID: 16048424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of training on physical therapists' ability to apply specified forces of palpation.
    Keating J; Matyas TA; Bach TM
    Phys Ther; 1993 Jan; 73(1):45-53. PubMed ID: 8417458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.